Unhandled fault: page domain fault (0x81b) at 0x00e41008
Mason
slash.tmp at free.fr
Sun Jan 24 05:27:25 PST 2016
On 24/01/2016 00:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> I'll quote what you said in previous mails in this thread,
> so there's no misunderstanding.
Russell,
Our "software stack" provides the kernel API under discussion:
{read,write}_data{8,16,32}
These 6 functions must be implemented, because they are part
of the API we provide to customers. As the "page domain fault"
underscores, my own implementation is incorrect. I am grateful
for the implementation you suggested up-thread, and will test
its performance on Monday.
Our "software stack" also provides several user-space tools,
some of which use the above kernel API. One of those tools is
the one I described, to copy files to remote RAM.
The current code uses write_data8, but the implementation is
irrelevant. Any implementation is acceptable, as long as the
tool works as expected. So I can take advantage of the tool's
specificities to optimize.
Anyway, thanks again for the guidance and advice, and please
give a little more credit.
Regards.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list