[PATCH v3] PCI: hosts: mark pcie/pci (msi) irq cascade handler as IRQF_NO_THREAD

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 01/13/2016 07:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> * Bjorn Helgaas | 2016-01-06 16:18:27 [-0600]:
>>
>>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>>> index 8c36880..0415192 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>>> @@ -301,8 +301,19 @@ static int __init dra7xx_add_pcie_port(struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx,
>>>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>>>   	}
>>>>
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * Mark dra7xx_pcie_msi IRQ as IRQF_NO_THREAD
>>>> +	 * On -RT and if kernel is booting with "threadirqs" cmd line parameter
>>>> +	 * the dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler() will be forced threaded but,
>>>> +	 * in the same time, it's IRQ dispatcher and calls generic_handle_irq(),
>>>> +	 * which, in turn, will be resolved to handle_simple_irq() call.
>>>> +	 * The handle_simple_irq() expected to be called with IRQ disabled, as
>>>> +	 * result kernle will display warning:
>>>> +	 * "irq XXX handler YYY+0x0/0x14 enabled interrupts".
>>>> +	 */
>>
>> could you _please_ remove this coment? This kind of comment (if at all)
>> should be part of the commit message (which is the case more or less).
>
> IIRC, Grygorii specifically wanted to keep this comment in dra7xx, but

True.

> I do agree that this level of detail is more appropriate for a changelog.
>
> If Grygorii and Kishon don't object, I can update the patch to remove it.

But no objections from my side. Thanks a lot.

-- 
regards,
-grygorii