[PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/io-pgtable: Avoid redundant TLB syncs
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Wed Jan 13 03:18:47 PST 2016
On 12/01/16 18:27, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:50:59PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> In certain unmapping situations it is quite possible to end up issuing
>> back-to-back TLB synchronisations, which at best is a waste of time and
>> effort, and at worst causes some hardware to get rather confused. Whilst
>> the pagetable implementations, or the IOMMU drivers, or both, could keep
>> track of things to avoid this happening, it seems to make the most sense
>> to prevent code duplication and add some simple state tracking in the
>> common interface between the two.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
>> index 95c5565..d06219b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
>> @@ -132,12 +132,14 @@ void free_io_pgtable_ops(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops);
>> * @fmt: The page table format.
>> * @cookie: An opaque token provided by the IOMMU driver and passed back to
>> * any callback routines.
>> + * @sync_flag: Private flag for optimising out redundant syncs.
>
> It makes sense to factor this out like you're proposing, but maybe we
> can think of a better name? How about "tlb_sync_pending", to follow
> "tlb_flush_pending" in the core code?
Ooh, tlb_flush_pending is a much nicer name indeed. It's almost as if I
threw this together in a pre-holiday rush and put very little thought
into it...
I've fixed it up locally, but I'll save the repost until after -rc1,
especially in case Yong has any further comments in the meantime.
Thanks,
Robin.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list