[PATCH] net: bpf: reject invalid shifts
Alexei Starovoitov
alexei.starovoitov at gmail.com
Tue Jan 12 10:51:22 PST 2016
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 06:55:07PM +0100, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On ARM64, a BUG() is triggered in the eBPF JIT if a filter with a
> constant shift that can't be encoded in the immediate field of the
> UBFM/SBFM instructions is passed to the JIT. Since these shifts
> amounts, which are negative or >= regsize, are invalid, reject then in
> the eBPF verifier and the classic BPF filter checker, for all
> architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin at rab.in>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++++++
> net/core/filter.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index a7945d10b378..3643df0dfaa9 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,16 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if ((opcode == BPF_LSH || opcode == BPF_RSH) &&
Missing check for opcode == BPF_ARSH
Otherwise looks good. Thank you for fixing this!
> @@ -777,6 +777,11 @@ static int bpf_check_classic(const struct sock_filter *filter,
> if (ftest->k == 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> break;
> + case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
> + case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
here it's good. ARSH is eBPF only.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list