[PATCH v2 0/3] USB: add generic onboard USB HUB driver

[Peter Chen]

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 08:18:02AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Peter Chen <hzpeterchen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:36:31AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> > 2. There are MFD USB devices, which includes several interfaces under
> >> > USB device,
> >> > like i2c, gpios, etc. Due to lack of device tree support, USB
> >> > class/device driver doesn't know
> >> > which kinds of interfaces are needed for this board.
> >>
> >> Are you talking about a device hard wired on the same board or
> >> something like GPIOs on FTDI chip which could be hot-plugged in any
> >> host (including non-DT based)?
> >
> > I talked about the case that the device hard wired on the board.
> > Hot-plug device's bus topology is unknown, we can't describe it
> > statically at dts.
> 
> Correct, upstream (the USB side) can't be described, but it is the
> downstream side we care about describing.

If it is hot-plug, there will be any USB devices at port, and it even
has a USB HUB between controller and the device we want to describe.

> 
> >> For the hotplug case, we will need a way to associate a DT overlay
> >> with the USB device and there may not even be a base DT to map the
> >> overlay into. In this case, the USB device's driver will need to load
> >> the overlay and trigger enumerating the child devices. Anyway, this is
> >> a separate issue from your problem.
> >>
> >
> > Since both you and Alan agree with my problem should be fixed at
> > bootloader, I give the kernel solution up.
> 
> Surprising, no one ever seems to agree with that solution... There
> will be people with this problem and unable to update their
> bootloader.
> 

See: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg134788.html

I am a little puzzled what's your opinion for this problem.

> > The another thing I open to discuss is how to let USB devices know its
> > device node, the user reported issue that they can't handle interfaces
> > below in USB device since that.
> 
> The driver for the USB device would need to load a DT overlay and from
> that it should be able to get its node and child nodes. The hard part
> is figuring out where to put the sub tree defined in the overlay as
> either there is no base DT (think x86) or there is but we don't want
> to describe the whole USB bus topology in DT (in theory we could
> populate USB nodes dynamically as USB devices are discovered).
> 
> Rob

I will send RFC patch for let the USB device know device node, but it is
not for my issue.

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen