[PATCH v2 32/32] virtio_ring: use virt_store_mb
Sergei Shtylyov
sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com
Fri Jan 1 09:23:46 PST 2016
Hello.
On 12/31/2015 10:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We need a full barrier after writing out event index, using
> virt_store_mb there seems better than open-coding. As usual, we need a
> wrapper to account for strong barriers.
>
> It's tempting to use this in vhost as well, for that, we'll
> need a variant of smp_store_mb that works on __user pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> index f3fa55b..3a74d91 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,18 @@ static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers)
> wmb();
> }
>
> +static inline void virtio_store_mb(bool weak_barriers,
> + __virtio16 *p, __virtio16 v)
> +{
> + if (weak_barriers)
> + virt_store_mb(*p, v);
> + else
> + {
The kernel coding style dictates:
if (weak_barriers) {
virt_store_mb(*p, v);
} else {
> + WRITE_ONCE(*p, v);
> + mb();
> + }
> +}
> +
[...]
MBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list