[PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC Board
Steffen Trumtrar
s.trumtrar at pengutronix.de
Thu Feb 25 02:38:20 PST 2016
Hi Tim!
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
> From: Tim Sander <tim at krieglstein.org>
>
> Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
> Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups are
> not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
> The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <tim at krieglstein.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> index 72e2c5a..d1f7803 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ synology Synology, Inc.
> tbs TBS Technologies
> tcl Toby Churchill Ltd.
> technologic Technologic Systems
> +terasic Terasic Inc.
> thine THine Electronics, Inc.
> ti Texas Instruments
> tlm Trusted Logic Mobility
You should IMHO split this up in two patches.
First patch: add terasic
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> index afea364..704aa9d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>
> / {
> model = "Terasic DE-0(Atlas)";
> - compatible = "altr,socfpga-cyclone5", "altr,socfpga";
> + compatible = "terasic,de0-nano-soc","altr,socfpga-cyclone5", "altr,socfpga";
Second patch: this.
>
> chosen {
> bootargs = "earlyprintk";
The naming of this board still confuses me though.
It has 3 different names now:
- de0_sockit.dts
- Terasic DE-0(Atlas)
- de0-nano-soc
And according to Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC is the same as Atlas-SoC with a different software?!
So all three names are actually correct ?! Weird.
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list