next-20160222 build: 5 failures 9 warnings (next-20160222)

[Brian Starkey]

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>I'm about to push the following patch on top of the KVM tree:
>
>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>index 43688d9..31fe7d6 100644
>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>@@ -333,11 +333,6 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t boot_pgd_ptr,
> 		     hyp_stack_ptr, vector_ptr);
> }
>
>-static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
>-{
>-	kvm_call_hyp(__init_stage2_translation);
>-}
>-
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>@@ -349,4 +344,11 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
>+/* #define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__) */
>+
>+static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
>+{
>+	kvm_call_hyp(__init_stage2_translation);
>+}
>+
> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
>
>This will create a new conflict, but will make the resolution 100% clear.

I applied this, but arm64 defconfig wouldn't build until I uncommented
the '#define kvm_call_hyp(...' line.

Is that right?

Thanks,
Brian

>
>Thanks,
>
>	M.
>-- 
>Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
>
>_______________________________________________
>linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>