[PATCH v2 1/2] efi: esrt: use memremap not ioremap to access ESRT table in memory

[Matt Fleming]

On Thu, 18 Feb, at 02:29:32PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 18 February 2016 at 14:28, Matt Fleming <matt at codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Feb, at 01:16:05PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 18 February 2016 at 11:44, Matt Fleming <matt at codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 15 Feb, at 12:32:32PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> On ARM and arm64, ioremap() and memremap() are not interchangeable like
> >> >> on x86, and the use of ioremap() on ordinary RAM is typically flagged
> >> >> as an error if the memory region being mapped is also covered by the
> >> >> linear mapping, since that would lead to aliases with conflicting
> >> >> cacheability attributes.
> >> >>
> >> >> Since what we are dealing with is not an I/O region with side effects,
> >> >> using ioremap() here is arguably incorrect anyway, so let's replace
> >> >> it with memremap instead. Also add a missing unmap on the success path,
> >> >> and drop a memblock_remove() call which does not belong here, this far
> >> >> into the boot sequence.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> >> >>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> >> @@ -432,8 +434,6 @@ static int __init esrt_sysfs_init(void)
> >> >>       if (error)
> >> >>               goto err_cleanup_list;
> >> >>
> >> >> -     memblock_remove(esrt_data, esrt_data_size);
> >> >> -
> >> >>       pr_debug("esrt-sysfs: loaded.\n");
> >> >>
> >> >>       return 0;
> >> >
> >> > Shouldn't we be replacing memblock_remove() with free_bootmem_late()?
> >> > The original ESRT region is still reserved at this point, so we should
> >> > do our best to release it to the page allocator.
> >>
> >> I'd rather we keep it reserved. That way, the config table entry still
> >> points to something valid, which could be useful for kexec(), I think?
> >> At least, that is how I intended to handle config tables on ARM ...
> >
> > If we're going to reserve it why do we need to copy the data out at
> > all in esrt_sysfs_init()?
> 
> Excellent question. I don't think there is any point to doing that.

... Unless the data is contained in an EFI Boot Services region ;-)

Peter?