[PATCH v2 1/2] efi: esrt: use memremap not ioremap to access ESRT table in memory

[Matt Fleming]

On Thu, 18 Feb, at 01:16:05PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 18 February 2016 at 11:44, Matt Fleming <matt at codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Feb, at 12:32:32PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On ARM and arm64, ioremap() and memremap() are not interchangeable like
> >> on x86, and the use of ioremap() on ordinary RAM is typically flagged
> >> as an error if the memory region being mapped is also covered by the
> >> linear mapping, since that would lead to aliases with conflicting
> >> cacheability attributes.
> >>
> >> Since what we are dealing with is not an I/O region with side effects,
> >> using ioremap() here is arguably incorrect anyway, so let's replace
> >> it with memremap instead. Also add a missing unmap on the success path,
> >> and drop a memblock_remove() call which does not belong here, this far
> >> into the boot sequence.
> >>
> >> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> @@ -432,8 +434,6 @@ static int __init esrt_sysfs_init(void)
> >>       if (error)
> >>               goto err_cleanup_list;
> >>
> >> -     memblock_remove(esrt_data, esrt_data_size);
> >> -
> >>       pr_debug("esrt-sysfs: loaded.\n");
> >>
> >>       return 0;
> >
> > Shouldn't we be replacing memblock_remove() with free_bootmem_late()?
> > The original ESRT region is still reserved at this point, so we should
> > do our best to release it to the page allocator.
> 
> I'd rather we keep it reserved. That way, the config table entry still
> points to something valid, which could be useful for kexec(), I think?
> At least, that is how I intended to handle config tables on ARM ...

If we're going to reserve it why do we need to copy the data out at
all in esrt_sysfs_init()?