KASAN issues with idle / hotplug area
Andrey Ryabinin
aryabinin at virtuozzo.com
Thu Feb 18 03:45:31 PST 2016
On 02/18/2016 12:39 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:22:24AM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I also tried using __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) directly, in
>>> case there was some header issue, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
>>>
>>> I'm using the Linaro 15.08 AArch64 GCC 5.1. Is anyone else able to
>>> confirm whether they see the same? Does the same happen for x86?
>>>
>>
>> Confirming, this happens on every GCC I have (including x86).
>> It seems that 'no_sanitize_address' in gcc removes only memory access checks
>> but it doesn't remove stack redzones.
>> I think this is wrong, e.g. clang removes instrumentation completely. I'll submit a bug.
>>
>> But we need fix this in kernel.
>> I see two options here:
>> * completely disable instrumentation for drivers/firmware/psci.c
>
> We have to have a way to disable instrumentation for functions that
> are used to call into FW and return via different code paths.
>
Unfortunately gcc doesn't allow us to do this yet.
>> * get back to assembly implementation
>
> No, we are certainly not reverting the SMCCC work because Kasan adds
> instrumentation to C functions, that's not even an option.
>
> Is it possible at all to implement a function to remove instrumentation
> for a chunk of memory (ie resetting the shadow memory to a clean slate
> for a range of stack addresses) ?
>
Yes, that's possible. We can tell that function resume SP, it can zero out all shadow for stack bellow that SP.
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list