[PATCH/RFC v2 01/11] PM / Domains: Add DT bindings for the R-Car System Controller

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Monday 15 February 2016 22:16:50 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The Renesas R-Car System Controller provides power management for the
> CPU cores and various coprocessors, following the generic PM domain
> bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt.
> 
> This supports R-Car Gen1, Gen2, and Gen3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> ---
> Alternatives I considered:
> 
>   - Using a single node per power register block, even if it contains
>     multiple domains, e.g.:
> 
> 	    pd_ca15_scu: ca15_scu at 180 {
> 		    reg = <0x180 0x20>;
> 		    #address-cells = <1>;
> 		    #size-cells = <0>;
> 		    #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> 		    renesas,interrupt-bits = <12>;
> 
> 		    pd_ca15_cpu: ca15_cpu at 40 {
> 			    reg = <0x40 0x20>;
> 			    #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> 			    renesas,pm-domain-indices = <0 1>;
> 			    renesas,pm-domain-names =
> 				    "ca15_cpu0", "ca15_cpu1";
> 			    renesas,interrupt-bits = <0 1>;
> 		    };
> 	    };
> 
>     Notes:
>       - You cannot just have a property with the number of domains, as
> 	index 0 is not used on R-Car H1. Hence the need for
> 	"renesas,pm-domain-indices" and "renesas,interrupt-bits",
>       - "#power-domain-cells = <1>" for nodes with multiple domains,
> 	which allows typos in "power-domains = <&pd_ca15_cpu n>", using
> 	an invalid value of "n".
> 
>   - Using a linear description in DT:
>       - Needs parent links for subdomains,
>       - More complicated to parse (lesson learned from R-Mobile PM
> 	Domain support).
> 
>   - Keeping the power register block offset and the bit number as separate
>     "reg" cells, increasing "#address-cells" from 2 to 3,
>
>   - Merging the interrupt bit (which needs only 5 bits) in the other "reg"
>     cell, decreasing "#address-cells" from 2 to 1.
> 
> v2:
>   - Add R-Car H3 (r8a7795) support,
>   - Use "renesas,<type>-sysc" instead of "renesas,sysc-<type>",
>   - Add fallback compatibility strings for R-Car Gen2 and Gen3.
> ---
>  .../bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt           | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt new file
> mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000..92ddc0da7b755215
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +DT bindings for the Renesas R-Car System Controller
> +
> +== System Controller Node ==
> +
> +The R-Car System Controller provides power management for the CPU cores and
> +various coprocessors.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +  - compatible: Must contain one or more of the following:
> +      - "renesas,r8a7779-sysc" (R-Car H1)
> +      - "renesas,r8a7790-sysc" (R-Car H2)
> +      - "renesas,r8a7791-sysc" (R-Car M2-W)
> +      - "renesas,r8a7792-sysc" (R-Car V2H)
> +      - "renesas,r8a7793-sysc" (R-Car M2-N)
> +      - "renesas,r8a7794-sysc" (R-Car E2)
> +      - "renesas,r8a7795-sysc" (R-Car H3)
> +      - "renesas,rcar-gen2-sysc" (Generic R-Car Gen2)
> +      - "renesas,rcar-gen3-sysc" (Generic R-Car Gen3)
> +    When compatible with the generic version, nodes must list the
> SoC-specific
> +    version corresponding to the platform first, followed by the generic
> +    version.
> +  - reg: Address start and address range for the device.

This isn't correct. I'll refrain from saying we abuse the reg property, as 
using the first cell as a power domain number should be fine (the second cell 
feels a bit more of an abuse to me though, but I won't complain too much), but 
the bindings document should describe what the reg cells contain.

> +  - pm-domains: This node contains a hierarchy of PM Domain Nodes.

Can't it be an issue that the node happens to have the same name as the 
standard pm-domains property ?

> +    Dependencies (e.g. parent SCUs should not be powered off while child
> CPUs
> +    are on) should be reflected using subnodes.
> +
> +
> +== PM Domain Nodes ==
> +
> +Each of the PM domain nodes represents a PM domain, as documented by the
> +generic PM domain bindings in
> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +  - #power-domain-cells: Must be 0.
> +  - reg: This property must contain 2 values:
> +	   - The first value is the number of the interrupt bit representing
> +	     the power area in the various Interrupt Registers (e.g. SYSCISR,
> +	     Interrupt Status Register),
> +	   - The second value encodes the power register block offset (which is
> +	     a multiple of 64), and the number of the bit representing the
> +	     power area in the various Power Control Registers (e.g. PWROFFSR,
> +	     Power Shutoff Status Register). This value is created by ORing
> +	     these two numbers.
> +	 The parent's node must contain the following two properties:
> +	   - #address-cells: Must be 2,
> +	   - #size-cells: Must be 0.
> +
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +	sysc: system-controller at e6180000 {
> +		compatible = "renesas,r8a7791-sysc", "renesas,rcar-gen2-sysc";
> +		reg = <0 0xe6180000 0 0x0200>;
> +
> +		pm-domains {
> +			#address-cells = <2>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +			pd_ca15_scu: scu at 12 {
> +				reg = <12 0x180>;
> +				#address-cells = <2>;
> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> +				#power-domain-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				pd_ca15_cpu0: cpu at 0 {
> +					reg = <0 0x40>;
> +					#power-domain-cells = <0>;
> +				};
> +
> +				pd_ca15_cpu1: cpu at 1 {
> +					reg = <1 0x41>;
> +					#power-domain-cells = <0>;
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			pd_sh: sh at 16 {
> +				reg = <16 0x80>;
> +				#power-domain-cells = <0>;
> +			};
> +
> +			pd_sgx: sgx at 20 {
> +				reg = <20 0xc0>;
> +				#power-domain-cells = <0>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart