Writes, smp_wmb(), and transitivity?
Paul E. McKenney
paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Feb 15 09:58:25 PST 2016
Hello!
Some architectures provide local transitivity for a chain of threads doing
writes separated by smp_wmb(), as exemplified by the litmus tests below.
The pattern is that each thread writes to a its own variable, does an
smp_wmb(), then writes a different value to the next thread's variable.
I don't know of a use of this, but if everyone supports it, it might
be good to mandate it. Status quo is that smp_wmb() is non-transitive,
so it currently isn't supported.
Anyone know of any architectures that do -not- support this?
Assuming all architectures -do- support this, any arguments -against-
officially supporting it in Linux?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two threads:
int a, b;
void thread0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
}
void thread1(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(a, 2);
}
/* After all threads have completed and the dust has settled... */
BUG_ON(a == 1 && b == 1);
Three threads:
int a, b, c;
void thread0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
}
void thread1(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(c, 2);
}
void thread2(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(c, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(a, 2);
}
/* After all threads have completed and the dust has settled... */
BUG_ON(a == 1 && b == 1 && c == 1);
Four threads:
int a, b, c, d;
void thread0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
}
void thread1(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(c, 2);
}
void thread2(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(c, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(d, 2);
}
void thread3(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(d, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(a, 2);
}
/* After all threads have completed and the dust has settled... */
BUG_ON(a == 1 && b == 1 && c == 1 && d == 1);
And so on...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list