[PATCH] rtc: mt6397: Add platform device ID table
Javier Martinez Canillas
javier at osg.samsung.com
Mon Feb 15 06:50:48 PST 2016
Hello Eddie,
On 02/14/2016 10:58 PM, Eddie Huang wrote:
[snip]
>> @@ -412,6 +418,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mtk_rtc_driver = {
>> },
>> .probe = mtk_rtc_probe,
>> .remove = mtk_rtc_remove,
>> + .id_table = mt6397_rtc_id,
>> };
>>
>> module_platform_driver(mtk_rtc_driver);
>> @@ -419,4 +426,3 @@ module_platform_driver(mtk_rtc_driver);
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Tianping Fang <tianping.fang at mediatek.com>");
>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RTC Driver for MediaTek MT6397 PMIC");
>> -MODULE_ALIAS("platform:mt6397-rtc");
>
> This patch looks good to me, but I am wondering, since we tend to use
> device tree method to match driver, do we still need support platform
> device ID ?
>
I'm not familiar with neither this IP block nor the SoC so it is up to
you. I just noticed this issue when reviewing a regulator driver for a
similar PMIC posted by someone from mediatek.
I thought platform device was needed since the driver has a MODULE_ALIAS()
but please let me know what you prefer and I can re-spin the patch and
just remove the MODULE_ALIAS() if that makes more sense for this platform.
> Eddie
>
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list