[PATCH V4 11/23] pci, acpi: Move ACPI host bridge device companion assignment to core code.
Lorenzo Pieralisi
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Tue Feb 9 10:02:27 PST 2016
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:28:49PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> Currently we have two platforms (x86 & ia64) capable of PCI ACPI host
> bridge initialization. They both use sysdata to pass down parent
> device reference and both rely on NULL parent in pci_create_root_bus()
> to validate sysdata content.
>
> It looks hacky and prevents us from getting some firmware specific
> info for PCI host controller e.g. PCI bus domain number.
> However, we overcome that blocker by passing down parent
> device via pci_create_root_bus parameter (as the ACPI device type)
> and using ACPI_COMPANION_SET in core code for ACPI boot method.
> ACPI_COMPANION_SET is safe to run for all cases DT, ACPI and DT&ACPI.
>
> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn at semihalf.com>
> Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang at apm.com>
> Tested-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3 at huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory at linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index ae3fe4e..a65c8c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -846,7 +846,10 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>
> pci_acpi_root_add_resources(info);
> pci_add_resource(&info->resources, &root->secondary);
> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, busnum, ops->pci_ops,
> +
> + /* Root bridge device needs to be sure of parent ACPI type */
You can improve the comment.
"pci_create_root_bus() needs to detect the parent device type,
so initialize its companion data accordingly".
> + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&device->dev, device);
> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(&device->dev, busnum, ops->pci_ops,
> sysdata, &info->resources);
> if (!bus)
> goto out_release_info;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 6d7ab9b..81dd3a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2100,6 +2100,8 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> bridge->dev.parent = parent;
> bridge->dev.release = pci_release_host_bridge_dev;
> dev_set_name(&bridge->dev, "pci%04x:%02x", pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
> + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev,
> + parent ? to_acpi_device_node(parent->fwnode) : NULL);
if (parent)
ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(parent));
?
It seems fine to me, hopefully Rafael can have a look to countercheck.
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> error = pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(bridge);
> if (error) {
> kfree(bridge);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list