[PATCH v11 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new vcpu device control group for PMUv3

Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Mon Feb 8 04:52:47 PST 2016


On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:14:16PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> 
> To configure the virtual PMUv3 overflow interrupt number, we use the
> vcpu kvm_device ioctl, encapsulating the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ
> attribute within the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL group.
> 
> After configuring the PMUv3, call the vcpu ioctl with attribute
> KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT to initialize the PMUv3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell at linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones at redhat.com>
> ---
> CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell at linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt |  24 ++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h            |  15 ++++
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c                         |   3 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |   6 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h          |   5 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c                     |  51 ++++++++++++
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h                      |  23 ++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c                         | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 255 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> index 3cc59c5..d626237 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> @@ -6,3 +6,27 @@ KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, and KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR. The interface uses the same struct
>  kvm_device_attr as other devices, but targets VCPU-wide settings and controls.
>  
>  The groups and attributes per virtual cpu, if any, are architecture specific.
> +
> +1. GROUP: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL
> +Architectures: ARM64
> +
> +1.1. ATTRIBUTE: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ
> +Parameters: in kvm_device_attr.addr the address for PMU overflow interrupt

so kvm_device_attr.addr is a pointer to an unsigned long or an int, or?

> +Returns: -EBUSY: The PMU overflow interrupt is already set
> +         -ENXIO: The overflow interrupt not set when attempting to get it
> +         -ENODEV: PMUv3 not supported
> +         -EINVAL: Invalid PMU overflow interrupt number supplied
> +
> +A value describing the PMUv3 (Performance Monitor Unit v3) overflow interrupt
> +number for this vcpu. This interrupt could be a PPI or SPI, but the interrupt
> +type must be same for each vcpu. As a PPI, the interrupt number is same for all

nit: s/is same/is the same/

> +vcpus, while as an SPI it must be different for each vcpu.

nit: s/it must be different for each vcpu/
       it must be a separate number per vcpu/

> +
> +1.2 ATTRIBUTE: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT
> +Parameters: no additional parameter in kvm_device_attr.addr
> +Returns: -ENODEV: PMUv3 not supported
> +         -ENXIO: PMUv3 not properly configured as required prior to calling this
> +                 attribute
> +         -EBUSY: PMUv3 already initialized
> +
> +Request the initialization of the PMUv3.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f9f2779..6dd0992 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -242,5 +242,20 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 34d7395..dc8644f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -846,6 +847,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -859,6 +861,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index cb220b7..a855a30 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -359,5 +359,11 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 6aedbe3..f209ea1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>  #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL	4
>  #define   KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT	0
>  
> +/* Device Control API on vcpu fd */
> +#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL	0
> +#define   KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ	0
> +#define   KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT	1
> +
>  /* KVM_IRQ_LINE irq field index values */
>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT		24
>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK		0xff
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index fcb7788..dbe45c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -380,3 +380,54 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 5f86e1d..f09abf6 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>  };
>  
>  #define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v)		((v)->arch.pmu.ready)
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(v)	((v)->arch.pmu.irq_num >= VGIC_NR_SGIS)
>  u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val);
>  u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -52,11 +53,18 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
>  				    u64 select_idx);
>  bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  #else
>  struct kvm_pmu {
>  };
>  
>  #define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v)		(false)
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(v)	(false)
>  static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  					    u64 select_idx)
>  {
> @@ -79,6 +87,21 @@ static inline void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  						  u64 data, u64 select_idx) {}
>  static inline bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void) { return false; }
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 2467d62..06b7cb3 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kvm.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>  #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
>  #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> @@ -393,3 +394,130 @@ bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void)
>  	 */
>  	return (perf_num_counters() > 0);
>  }
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features) ||
> +	    !kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	if (kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
> +	vcpu->arch.pmu.ready = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +				  struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> +				  int *irq, bool is_set)
> +{
> +	if (!is_set) {
> +		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			return -ENXIO;
> +
> +		*irq = vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num;
> +	} else {
> +		if (kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +
> +		kvm_debug("Set kvm ARM PMU irq: %d\n", *irq);
> +		vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num = *irq;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

are you going to be reusing this function in later patches?  If not, I
don't see the benefit of having this indirection over simply including
it directly in the callers below.

> +
> +static bool irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool is_ppi)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (is_ppi) {
> +			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num != irq)
> +				return false;
> +		} else {
> +			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num == irq)
> +				return false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
> +		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> +		int reg;
> +
> +		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The PMU overflow interrupt could be a PPI or SPI, but for one
> +		 * VM the interrupt type must be same for each vcpu. As a PPI,
> +		 * the interrupt number is same for all vcpus, while as an SPI
> +		 * it must be different for each vcpu.
> +		 */
> +		if (reg < VGIC_NR_SGIS || reg >= vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs ||
> +		    !irq_is_valid(vcpu->kvm, reg, reg < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		return kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(vcpu, attr, &reg, true);
> +	}
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> +		return kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(vcpu);
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
> +		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> +		int reg = -1;
> +
> +		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(vcpu, attr, &reg, false);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		return put_user(reg, uaddr);
> +	}
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ:
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> +		if (kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() &&
> +		    test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.0.4
> 
> 

Besides the style and wording comments:

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list