[PATCH v5 09/14] ACPI: platform: setup MSI domain for ACPI based platform device
Rafael J. Wysocki
rafael at kernel.org
Thu Dec 22 04:57:50 PST 2016
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun at huawei.com> wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
>
> With the platform msi domain created, we can set up the msi domain
> for a platform device when it's probed.
>
> In order to do that, we need to get the domain that the platform
> device connecting to, so the iort_get_platform_device_domain() is
> introduced to retrieve the domain from iort.
>
> After the domain is retrieved, we need a proper way to set the
> domain to paltform device, as some platform devices such as an
> irqchip needs the msi irqdomain to be the interrupt parent domain,
> we need to get irqdomain before platform device is probed but after
> the platform device is allocated, so introduce a callback (pre_add_cb)
> in pdevinfo to prepare firmware related information which is needed
> for device probe, then set the msi domain in that callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/base/platform.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/platform_device.h | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> index b4c1a6a..5d8d61b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi_iort.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -48,6 +49,15 @@ static void acpi_platform_fill_resource(struct acpi_device *adev,
> }
>
> /**
> + * acpi_platform_pre_add_cb - callback before platform device is added, to
> + * prepare firmware related information which is needed for device probe
> + */
> +static void acpi_platform_pre_add_cb(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + acpi_configure_pmsi_domain(dev);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * acpi_create_platform_device - Create platform device for ACPI device node
> * @adev: ACPI device node to create a platform device for.
> * @properties: Optional collection of build-in properties.
> @@ -109,6 +119,7 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
> pdevinfo.num_res = count;
> pdevinfo.fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
> pdevinfo.properties = properties;
> + pdevinfo.pre_add_cb = acpi_platform_pre_add_cb;
Why don't you point that directly to acpi_configure_pmsi_domain()? It
doesn't look like the wrapper is necessary at all.
And I'm not sure why the new callback is necessary ->
>
> if (acpi_dma_supported(adev))
> pdevinfo.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index bc68d93..6b72fcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -527,6 +527,49 @@ struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
> return irq_find_matching_fwnode(handle, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * iort_get_platform_device_domain() - Find MSI domain related to a
> + * platform device
> + * @dev: the dev pointer associated with the platform device
> + *
> + * Returns: the MSI domain for this device, NULL otherwise
> + */
> +static struct irq_domain *iort_get_platform_device_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_iort_node *node, *msi_parent;
> + struct fwnode_handle *iort_fwnode;
> + struct acpi_iort_its_group *its;
> +
> + /* find its associated iort node */
> + node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT,
> + iort_match_node_callback, dev);
> + if (!node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* then find its msi parent node */
> + msi_parent = iort_node_get_id(node, NULL, IORT_MSI_TYPE, 0);
> + if (!msi_parent)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Move to ITS specific data */
> + its = (struct acpi_iort_its_group *)msi_parent->node_data;
> +
> + iort_fwnode = iort_find_domain_token(its->identifiers[0]);
> + if (!iort_fwnode)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return irq_find_matching_fwnode(iort_fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI);
> +}
> +
> +void acpi_configure_pmsi_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
> +
> + msi_domain = iort_get_platform_device_domain(dev);
> + if (msi_domain)
> + dev_set_msi_domain(dev, msi_domain);
> +}
> +
> static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
> {
> u32 *rid = data;
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index c4af003..3e68f31 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -537,6 +537,9 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
> goto err;
> }
>
> + if (pdevinfo->pre_add_cb)
> + pdevinfo->pre_add_cb(&pdev->dev);
> +
-> because it looks like this might be done in acpi_platform_notify()
for platform devices.
> ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
> if (ret) {
Thanks,
Rafael
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list