[PATCH 2/3] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add arm_pmu_device_remove
Alexander Stein
alexander.stein at systec-electronic.com
Wed Dec 21 06:45:48 PST 2016
On Wednesday 21 December 2016 14:38:54, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:19:34AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > Add ARM PMU removal function. This will be required by perf event drivers
> > when option DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE is enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at systec-electronic.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > index a9bbdbf..b7ddc4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > @@ -1022,6 +1022,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev,>
> > armpmu_init(pmu);
> >
> > pmu->plat_device = pdev;
> >
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu);
> >
> > if (node && (of_id = of_match_node(of_table, pdev->dev.of_node))) {
> >
> > init_fn = of_id->data;
> >
> > @@ -1073,6 +1074,19 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev,>
> > return ret;
> >
> > }
> >
> > +int arm_pmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_pmu *pmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > + __oprofile_cpu_pmu = NULL;
> > +
> > + perf_pmu_unregister(&pmu->pmu);
> > +
> > + cpu_pmu_destroy(pmu);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> So normally, if there are events that use this pmu, we hold a reference
> on its module, which avoids removal from happening.
>
> How is that guarantee made by DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE ? Or will it
> simply kill everything even though there's active events for the PMU?
AFAICS you won't be able to hold any reference until this test remove is done.
This feature is implemented in really_probe(). If the driver is successfully
probed it will be removed and probed again.
But reading that part of the code I stumbled over suppress_bind_attrs which
would prevent this procedure. After some grepping I found commit 80c6397c3
("clk: oxnas: make it explicitly non-modular").
Essentially setting
> .suppress_bind_attrs = true
in the platform_driver.
IMHO this seems far better than to add some remove functions only for testing
a non-removable driver. I'll come up with a 2nd series, patch 1/3 is still
valid.
Best regards,
Alexander
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list