[PATCH v2] rtc: armada38x: Followed the new recommendation for errata implementation
Alexandre Belloni
alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com
Wed Dec 21 01:44:49 PST 2016
On 21/12/2016 at 10:02:54 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote :
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On mer., déc. 21 2016, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
>
> I agree with all your remark expect one, see below:
> [...]
> >> rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtc_dev, 1, event);
> >>
> >> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >> @@ -221,6 +282,11 @@ static __init int armada38x_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> if (!rtc)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> + rtc->val_to_freq = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, SAMPLE_NR,
> >> + sizeof(struct value_to_freq), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!rtc->val_to_freq)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >
> > The whole struct armada38x_rtc is already allocated just before. Maybe
> > you can put the whole array inside the structure instead of doing a new
> > allocation.
>
> Actually it was done on purpose. Indeed the same RTC IP is used in the
> Armada 3700 (a patch is coming soon), and for this IP this issue was
> fixed and we do not need to store 100 read. That's why I want to
> allocate the array only if needed.
>
Fair enough
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list