[PATCH] ARM: dts: dra72-evm-tps65917: Add voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc, dss

[Roger Quadros]

On 14/12/16 14:35, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 14 December 2016 04:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Lokesh,
>>
>> On 14/12/16 10:57, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> Commit 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
>>> added a separate dtsi for dra72-evm-tps65917 moving all the voltage supplies
>>> to this file. But it missed adding voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc,
>>> dss and deleted from dra72-evm-common.dtsi. Adding the voltage supply
>>> phandles to these nodes in dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
>>> Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh at ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Logs:
>>> - DRA72-evm revC: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627665/ 
>>> - DRA72-evm revB: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627658/
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>> index ee6dac44edf1..e6df676886c0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>> @@ -132,3 +132,19 @@
>>>  		ti,palmas-long-press-seconds = <6>;
>>>  	};
>>>  };
>>> +
>>> +&usb2_phy1 {
>>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&usb2_phy2 {
>>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&dss {
>>> +	vdda_video-supply = <&ldo5_reg>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&mmc1 {
>>> +	vmmc_aux-supply = <&ldo1_reg>;
>>> +};
>>>
>>
>> Are you sure that all future users of dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi will use this same configuration?
>> If not I'd rather put this in the board dts files.
> 
> hmm..This debate already happened when creating dra72-evm-tps65917 file
> and concluded that all the common regulator stuff on dra72 evm revA,B,C
> should go in this file. Any new board which is not similar to dra72-evm
> will not be using this file.

OK, then it is fine. Thanks for clarifying.

cheers,
-roger