[PATCH] net: mvpp2: fix dma unmapping of TX buffers for fragments
Marcin Wojtas
mw at semihalf.com
Tue Dec 13 09:03:33 PST 2016
Hi Thomas,
Reviewed-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw at semihalf.com>
Best regards,
Marcin
2016-12-13 17:53 GMT+01:00 Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>:
> Since commit 71ce391dfb784 ("net: mvpp2: enable proper per-CPU TX
> buffers unmapping"), we are not correctly DMA unmapping TX buffers for
> fragments.
>
> Indeed, the mvpp2_txq_inc_put() function only stores in the
> txq_cpu->tx_buffs[] array the physical address of the buffer to be
> DMA-unmapped when skb != NULL. In addition, when DMA-unmapping, we use
> skb_headlen(skb) to get the size to be unmapped. Both of this works fine
> for TX descriptors that are associated directly to a SKB, but not the
> ones that are used for fragments, with a NULL pointer as skb:
>
> - We have a NULL physical address when calling DMA unmap
> - skb_headlen(skb) crashes because skb is NULL
>
> This causes random crashes when fragments are used.
>
> To solve this problem, this commit:
>
> - Stores the physical address of the buffer to be unmapped
> unconditionally, regardless of whether it is tied to a SKB or not.
>
> - Adds a txq_cpu->tx_data_size[] array to store the size of the DMA
> buffer to be unmapped upon TX completion.
>
> Fixes: 71ce391dfb784 ("net: mvpp2: enable proper per-CPU TX buffers unmapping")
> Reported-by: Raphael G <raphael.glon at corp.ovh.com>
> Cc: Raphael G <raphael.glon at corp.ovh.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c
> index 1026c45..d168b13 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c
> @@ -791,6 +791,8 @@ struct mvpp2_txq_pcpu {
> /* Array of transmitted buffers' physical addresses */
> dma_addr_t *tx_buffs;
>
> + size_t *tx_data_size;
> +
> /* Index of last TX DMA descriptor that was inserted */
> int txq_put_index;
>
> @@ -980,9 +982,10 @@ static void mvpp2_txq_inc_put(struct mvpp2_txq_pcpu *txq_pcpu,
> struct mvpp2_tx_desc *tx_desc)
> {
> txq_pcpu->tx_skb[txq_pcpu->txq_put_index] = skb;
> - if (skb)
> - txq_pcpu->tx_buffs[txq_pcpu->txq_put_index] =
> - tx_desc->buf_phys_addr;
> + txq_pcpu->tx_data_size[txq_pcpu->txq_put_index] =
> + tx_desc->data_size;
> + txq_pcpu->tx_buffs[txq_pcpu->txq_put_index] =
> + tx_desc->buf_phys_addr;
> txq_pcpu->txq_put_index++;
> if (txq_pcpu->txq_put_index == txq_pcpu->size)
> txq_pcpu->txq_put_index = 0;
> @@ -4404,11 +4407,13 @@ static void mvpp2_txq_bufs_free(struct mvpp2_port *port,
> dma_addr_t buf_phys_addr =
> txq_pcpu->tx_buffs[txq_pcpu->txq_get_index];
> struct sk_buff *skb = txq_pcpu->tx_skb[txq_pcpu->txq_get_index];
> + size_t data_size =
> + txq_pcpu->tx_data_size[txq_pcpu->txq_get_index];
>
> mvpp2_txq_inc_get(txq_pcpu);
>
> dma_unmap_single(port->dev->dev.parent, buf_phys_addr,
> - skb_headlen(skb), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + data_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> if (!skb)
> continue;
> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> @@ -4662,6 +4667,11 @@ static int mvpp2_txq_init(struct mvpp2_port *port,
> if (!txq_pcpu->tx_buffs)
> goto error;
>
> + txq_pcpu->tx_data_size = kmalloc(txq_pcpu->size *
> + sizeof(size_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!txq_pcpu->tx_data_size)
> + goto error;
> +
> txq_pcpu->count = 0;
> txq_pcpu->reserved_num = 0;
> txq_pcpu->txq_put_index = 0;
> @@ -4675,6 +4685,7 @@ static int mvpp2_txq_init(struct mvpp2_port *port,
> txq_pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(txq->pcpu, cpu);
> kfree(txq_pcpu->tx_skb);
> kfree(txq_pcpu->tx_buffs);
> + kfree(txq_pcpu->tx_data_size);
> }
>
> dma_free_coherent(port->dev->dev.parent,
> @@ -4695,6 +4706,7 @@ static void mvpp2_txq_deinit(struct mvpp2_port *port,
> txq_pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(txq->pcpu, cpu);
> kfree(txq_pcpu->tx_skb);
> kfree(txq_pcpu->tx_buffs);
> + kfree(txq_pcpu->tx_data_size);
> }
>
> if (txq->descs)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list