[PATCH v2] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire section
Ard Biesheuvel
ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Mon Dec 12 04:02:42 PST 2016
On 9 December 2016 at 14:52, Robert Richter <robert.richter at cavium.com> wrote:
> On 09.12.16 21:15:12, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> For invalid pages, their zone and node information is not initialized, and it
>> do have risk to trigger the BUG_ON, so I have a silly question,
>> why not just change the BUG_ON:
>
> We need to get the page handling correct. Modifying the BUG_ON() just
> hides that something is wrong.
>
Actually, I think this is a reasonable question. We are trying very
hard to work around the BUG_ON(), which arguably does something wrong
by calling page_to_nid() on a struct page without checking if it is a
valid page.
Looking at commit 344c790e3821 ("mm: make setup_zone_migrate_reserve()
aware of overlapping nodes"), the BUG_ON() has a specific purpose
related to adjacent zones.
What will go wrong if we ignore this check?
>
>> -----------
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 6de9440..af199b8 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -1860,12 +1860,13 @@ int move_freepages(struct zone *zone,
>> * Remove at a later date when no bug reports exist related to
>> * grouping pages by mobility
>> */
>> - VM_BUG_ON(page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page));
>> + VM_BUG_ON(early_pfn_valid(start_page) && early_pfn_valid(end_page) &&
>> + page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page));
>> #endif
>>
>> for (page = start_page; page <= end_page;) {
>> /* Make sure we are not inadvertently changing nodes */
>> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_to_nid(page) != zone_to_nid(zone), page);
>> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(early_pfn_valid(page) && (page_to_nid(page) != zone_to_nid(zone)), page);
>>
>> if (!pfn_valid_within(page_to_pfn(page))) {
>> page++;
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list