[PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: da850: fix infinite loop in clk_set_rate()
Sekhar Nori
nsekhar at ti.com
Mon Dec 5 00:38:12 PST 2016
On Friday 02 December 2016 09:08 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This
> breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list
> links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in
> propagate_rate().
>
> Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif
> clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski at baylibre.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++-
> drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> index e770c97..1fcc986 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = {
> .flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
> };
>
> +static struct clk nand_clk = {
> + .name = "nand",
> + .parent = &aemif_clk,
> +};
> +
> static struct clk usb11_clk = {
> .name = "usb11",
> .parent = &pll0_sysclk4,
> @@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = {
> CLK("da830-mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd0_clk),
> CLK("da830-mmc.1", NULL, &mmcsd1_clk),
> CLK("ti-aemif", NULL, &aemif_clk),
> - CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_clk),
> + CLK(NULL, "nand", &nand_clk),
Why use a NULL device name here?
> CLK("ohci-da8xx", "usb11", &usb11_clk),
> CLK("musb-da8xx", "usb20", &usb20_clk),
> CLK("spi_davinci.0", NULL, &spi0_clk),
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> index 27fa8b8..5857d06 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "aemif");
> + info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "nand");
This driver is used by keystone devices too. So just changing the
connection id will likely break them. Why do you need to change the
connection id?
Thanks,
Sekhar
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list