[Linaro-acpi] ACPI namespace details for ARM64

[Jon Masters]

On 11/11/2016 09:24 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 6:18 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 11/09/2016 03:05 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on
>>> arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for
>>> PCI.  I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm
>>> going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to
>>> make sure we're all on the same page.  Please correct my errors and
>>> misunderstandings.
>>>
>>> Bjorn
>>>
>>> [snip....]
>>
>> A big +1 to all of this.  This also looks like something that should
>> be added to either PCI, ACPI or arm64 documentation (or even all three).
>> What do you think?
> 
> 
> I agree. In order to have compliant systems, we have to make PNP0C02 required
> in the PCIe appendix of the SBSA specification.

We're ramping up for a "Constitutional Convention" on the SBBR between a
few of the vendors and we'll make sure this is covered.

Jon.

-- 
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop