[PATCH v5 net-next 4/7] net: mvneta: Convert to be 64 bits compatible
Jisheng Zhang
jszhang at marvell.com
Thu Dec 1 03:26:04 PST 2016
Hi Gregory, Marcin,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:42:49 +0100 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> From: Marcin Wojtas <mw at semihalf.com>
>
> Prepare the mvneta driver in order to be usable on the 64 bits platform
> such as the Armada 3700.
>
> [gregory.clement at free-electrons.com]: this patch was extract from a larger
> one to ease review and maintenance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw at semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index 92b9af14c352..8ef03fb69bcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -296,6 +296,12 @@
> /* descriptor aligned size */
> #define MVNETA_DESC_ALIGNED_SIZE 32
>
> +/* Number of bytes to be taken into account by HW when putting incoming data
> + * to the buffers. It is needed in case NET_SKB_PAD exceeds maximum packet
> + * offset supported in MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG(q) registers.
We also brought up this driver on 64bit platforms, we doesn't have this
patch. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm trying to understand why we need this
modification. Let's assume the NET_SKB_PAD is 64B, we call
mvneta_rxq_offset_set(pp, rxq, 64),
{
u32 val;
val = mvreg_read(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG(rxq->id));
val &= ~MVNETA_RXQ_PKT_OFFSET_ALL_MASK;
/* Offset is in */
val |= MVNETA_RXQ_PKT_OFFSET_MASK(offset >> 3);
// then this will be "val |= 8;" it doesn't exceeds the max offset of
MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG(q) register.
Could you please kindly point out where I am wrong?
> + */
> +#define MVNETA_RX_PKT_OFFSET_CORRECTION 64
> +
> #define MVNETA_RX_PKT_SIZE(mtu) \
> ALIGN((mtu) + MVNETA_MH_SIZE + MVNETA_VLAN_TAG_LEN + \
> ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN, \
> @@ -416,6 +422,7 @@ struct mvneta_port {
> u64 ethtool_stats[ARRAY_SIZE(mvneta_statistics)];
>
> u32 indir[MVNETA_RSS_LU_TABLE_SIZE];
> + u16 rx_offset_correction;
> };
>
> /* The mvneta_tx_desc and mvneta_rx_desc structures describe the
> @@ -1807,6 +1814,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_refill(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + phys_addr += pp->rx_offset_correction;
> mvneta_rx_desc_fill(rx_desc, phys_addr, data, rxq);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -2782,7 +2790,7 @@ static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_SIZE_REG(rxq->id), rxq->size);
>
> /* Set Offset */
> - mvneta_rxq_offset_set(pp, rxq, NET_SKB_PAD);
> + mvneta_rxq_offset_set(pp, rxq, NET_SKB_PAD - pp->rx_offset_correction);
>
> /* Set coalescing pkts and time */
> mvneta_rx_pkts_coal_set(pp, rxq, rxq->pkts_coal);
> @@ -4033,6 +4041,13 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pp->rxq_def = rxq_def;
>
> + /* Set RX packet offset correction for platforms, whose
> + * NET_SKB_PAD, exceeds 64B. It should be 64B for 64-bit
> + * platforms and 0B for 32-bit ones.
Even we need this patch, I'm not sure this last comment is correct or not.
NET_SKB_PAD is defined as:
#define NET_SKB_PAD max(32, L1_CACHE_BYTES)
we have 64B cacheline 32bit platforms, on this platforms, the NET_SKB_PAD
should be 64B as well.
Thanks,
Jisheng
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list