[PATCH 3/3] clk: keystone: Add sci-clk driver support
Tero Kristo
t-kristo at ti.com
Wed Aug 31 11:35:52 PDT 2016
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for comments, inlined replies below.
On 24/08/16 11:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/19, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> THANKO'S RAREMONO AM/FM/SW RADIO RECEIVER USB DRIVER
>> M: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil at xs4all.nl>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>> index e2d9bd760c84..d1724999be78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>> @@ -179,6 +179,19 @@ config COMMON_CLK_NXP
>> ---help---
>> Support for clock providers on NXP platforms.
>>
>> +if COMMON_CLK_KEYSTONE
>
> Why not depends on COMMON_CLK_KEYSTONE? Or make the tristate have
> an if COMMON_CLK_KEYSTONE after it? So far an if <CONFIG> hasn't
> happened in this file. And is anything inside
> drivers/clk/keystone used by this driver? Maybe this if statement
> can just be dropped entirely and then the keystone/Makefile
> updated?
Yea will fix that.
>
>> +
>> +config TI_SCI_CLK
>> + tristate "TI System Control Interface clock drivers"
>> + depends on TI_SCI_PROTOCOL || COMPILE_TEST
>> + default y
>
> default TI_SCI_PROTOCOL?
That too.
>
>> + help
>> + This adds the clock driver support over TI System Control Interface.
>> + If you wish to use clock resources from the PMMC firmware, say Y.
>> + Otherwise, say N.
>> +
>> +endif # COMMON_CLK_KEYSTONE
>> +
>> config COMMON_CLK_PALMAS
>> tristate "Clock driver for TI Palmas devices"
>> depends on MFD_PALMAS
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6c43e097e6d6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,539 @@
>> +/*
>> + * SCI Clock driver for keystone based devices
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2015-2016 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>> + * Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
>> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
>> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>
> Is this include used?
Yes, it seems I get a compile fail if this is not included:
CC drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.o
drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c: In function 'ti_sci_clk_parse_flags':
drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c:444:3: error: implicit declaration of
function 'of_clk_get_from_provider' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
clk = of_clk_get_from_provider(&clkspec);
However, as there is the new API for clk_hw xlate, not sure if this is
needed once I convert the driver to use that. Will check.
>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h>
>> +
>> +#define SCI_CLK_SSC_ENABLE BIT(0)
>> +#define SCI_CLK_ALLOW_FREQ_CHANGE BIT(1)
>> +#define SCI_CLK_INPUT_TERMINATION BIT(2)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct sci_clk_provider - TI SCI clock provider representation
>> + * @sci: Handle to the System Control Interface protocol handler
>> + * @ops: Pointer to the SCI ops to be used by the clocks
>> + * @dev: Device pointer for the clock provider
>> + * @clocks: List of all registered clocks
>> + * @lock: Mutex for locking access to the @clocks list
>> + */
>> +struct sci_clk_provider {
>> + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci;
>> + const struct ti_sci_clk_ops *ops;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct list_head clocks;
>> + struct mutex lock; /* Protects access to the @clocks list */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct sci_clk - TI SCI clock representation
>> + * @hw: Hardware clock cookie for common clock framework
>> + * @dev_id: Device index
>> + * @clk_id: Clock index
>> + * @node: Clocks list link
>> + * @provider: Master clock provider
>> + * @flags: Flags for the clock
>> + */
>> +struct sci_clk {
>> + struct clk_hw hw;
>> + u16 dev_id;
>> + u8 clk_id;
>> + struct list_head node;
>> + struct sci_clk_provider *provider;
>> + u8 flags;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define to_sci_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct sci_clk, hw)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_prepare - Prepare (enable) a TI SCI clock
>> + * @hw: clock to prepare
>> + *
>> + * Prepares a clock to be actively used. Returns the SCI protocol status.
>> + */
>> +static int sci_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> + bool enable_ssc = clk->flags & SCI_CLK_SSC_ENABLE;
>> + bool allow_freq_change = clk->flags & SCI_CLK_ALLOW_FREQ_CHANGE;
>> + bool input_termination = clk->flags & SCI_CLK_INPUT_TERMINATION;
>> +
>> + return clk->provider->ops->get_clock(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id, enable_ssc,
>> + allow_freq_change,
>> + input_termination);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_unprepare - Un-prepares (disables) a TI SCI clock
>> + * @hw: clock to unprepare
>> + *
>> + * Un-prepares a clock from active state.
>> + */
>> +static void sci_clk_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = clk->provider->ops->put_clock(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(clk->provider->dev,
>> + "unprepare failed for dev=%d, clk=%d, ret=%d\n",
>> + clk->dev_id, clk->clk_id, ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_is_prepared - Check if a TI SCI clock is prepared or not
>> + * @hw: clock to check status for
>> + *
>> + * Checks if a clock is prepared (enabled) in hardware. Returns non-zero
>> + * value if clock is enabled, zero otherwise.
>> + */
>> +static int sci_clk_is_prepared(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> + bool req_state, current_state;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = clk->provider->ops->is_on(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id, &req_state,
>> + ¤t_state);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(clk->provider->dev,
>> + "prepare failed for dev=%d, clk=%d, ret=%d\n",
>
> s/prepare/is_prepared/ ?
Will fix.
>
>> + clk->dev_id, clk->clk_id, ret);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return req_state;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_recalc_rate - Get clock rate for a TI SCI clock
>> + * @hw: clock to get rate for
>> + * @parent_rate: parent rate provided by common clock framework, not used
>> + *
>> + * Gets the current clock rate of a TI SCI clock. Returns the current
>> + * clock rate, or zero in failure.
>> + */
>> +static unsigned long sci_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> + unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> + u64 freq;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = clk->provider->ops->get_freq(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id, &freq);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(clk->provider->dev,
>> + "recalc-rate failed for dev=%d, clk=%d, ret=%d\n",
>> + clk->dev_id, clk->clk_id, ret);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return (u32)freq;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_determine_rate - Determines a clock rate a clock can be set to
>> + * @hw: clock to change rate for
>> + * @req: requested rate configuration for the clock
>> + *
>> + * Determines a suitable clock rate and parent for a TI SCI clock.
>> + * The parent handling is un-used, as generally the parent clock rates
>> + * are not known by the kernel; instead these are internally handled
>> + * by the firmware. Returns the new clock rate that can be set for the
>> + * clock, or 0 in failure.
>> + */
>> +static int sci_clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> + u64 new_rate;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = clk->provider->ops->get_best_match_freq(clk->provider->sci,
>> + clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id,
>> + req->min_rate,
>> + req->rate,
>> + req->max_rate,
>> + &new_rate);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(clk->provider->dev,
>> + "determine-rate failed for dev=%d, clk=%d, ret=%d\n",
>> + clk->dev_id, clk->clk_id, ret);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return (int)new_rate;
>
> determine rate should return a negative number on failure and 0
> on success. The actual rate that was found should go into
> req->rate. This looks broken.
Yea it seems broken, I wonder how we haven't seen any issues with this
in testing.... Apparently positive return values from this are
interpreted as success. Having a quick look at clk.c seems to confirm this.
Anyway, will fix.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_set_rate - Set rate for a TI SCI clock
>> + * @hw: clock to change rate for
>> + * @rate: target rate for the clock
>> + * @parent_rate: rate of the clock parent, not used for TI SCI clocks
>> + *
>> + * Sets a clock frequency for a TI SCI clock. Returns the TI SCI
>> + * protocol status.
>> + */
>> +static int sci_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> + unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> + u64 freq = rate;
>
> We can't just pass rate three times?
I believe we can, will fix.
>
>> +
>> + return clk->provider->ops->set_freq(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id, freq, freq, freq);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_get_parent - Get the current parent of a TI SCI clock
>> + * @hw: clock to get parent for
>> + *
>> + * Returns the index of the currently selected parent for a TI SCI clock.
>> + */
>> +static u8 sci_clk_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> + u8 parent_id;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = clk->provider->ops->get_parent(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id, &parent_id);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(clk->provider->dev,
>> + "get-parent failed for dev=%d, clk=%d, ret=%d\n",
>> + clk->dev_id, clk->clk_id, ret);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + parent_id = parent_id - clk->clk_id - 1;
>> +
>> + return parent_id;
>
> Why not just return parent_id - clk->clk_id - 1?
Yea will fix that. Looks like a remnant of debugging code (like many
other mishaps in the driver actually.)
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_set_parent - Set the parent of a TI SCI clock
>> + * @hw: clock to set parent for
>> + * @index: new parent index for the clock
>> + *
>> + * Sets the parent of a TI SCI clock. Return TI SCI protocol status.
>> + */
>> +static int sci_clk_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> +
>> + return clk->provider->ops->set_parent(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
>> + clk->clk_id,
>> + index + 1 + clk->clk_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_ops sci_clk_ops = {
>> + .prepare = sci_clk_prepare,
>> + .unprepare = sci_clk_unprepare,
>> + .is_prepared = sci_clk_is_prepared,
>> + .recalc_rate = sci_clk_recalc_rate,
>> + .determine_rate = sci_clk_determine_rate,
>> + .set_rate = sci_clk_set_rate,
>> + .get_parent = sci_clk_get_parent,
>> + .set_parent = sci_clk_set_parent,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * _sci_clk_get - Gets a handle for an SCI clock
>> + * @provider: Handle to SCI clock provider
>> + * @dev_id: device ID for the clock to register
>> + * @clk_id: clock ID for the clock to register
>> + * @parse_parents: indicator whether parents for this clock should be handled
>> + *
>> + * Gets a handle to an existing TI SCI clock, or builds a new clock
>> + * entry and registers it with the common clock framework. Called from
>> + * the common clock framework, when a corresponding of_clk_get call is
>> + * executed, or recursively from itself when parsing parent clocks.
>> + * Returns a pointer to the clock struct, or ERR_PTR value in failure.
>> + */
>
> Please move this driver to clk_hw_register() and friends. This on
> the fly clk generation is scary considering how we hold locks
> while the provider is asked to give us the pointer, so allocating
> and registering clks (basically reentering the CCF again) could
> lead to a locking nightmare. Best to avoid that.
Ok, so just converting the driver to use provider->get_hw should be
enough? This seems to be a relatively new API in the CCF. Will look at that.
>
>> +static struct clk *_sci_clk_get(struct sci_clk_provider *provider,
>> + u16 dev_id, u8 clk_id, bool parse_parents)
>> +{
>> + struct clk_init_data init = { NULL };
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + struct sci_clk *sci_clk = NULL;
>> + char name[20];
>> + char **parent_names = NULL;
>> + int i;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(sci_clk, &provider->clocks, node)
>> + if (sci_clk->dev_id == dev_id && sci_clk->clk_id == clk_id)
>> + return sci_clk->hw.clk;
>> +
>> + sci_clk = devm_kzalloc(provider->dev, sizeof(*sci_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!sci_clk) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sci_clk->dev_id = dev_id;
>> + sci_clk->clk_id = clk_id;
>> + sci_clk->provider = provider;
>> +
>> + if (parse_parents) {
>> + ret = provider->ops->get_num_parents(provider->sci, dev_id,
>> + clk_id,
>> + &init.num_parents);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + snprintf(name, 20, "%s:%d:%d", dev_name(provider->dev), sci_clk->dev_id,
>> + sci_clk->clk_id);
>
> I hope we don't make dev_name() longer than 20 characters
Shall I just increase the size of the buffer and add a length check?
Using kmalloc or something here seems overkill, as the name gets copied
by CCF anyway.
>
>> +
>> + init.name = name;
>> +
>> + if (init.num_parents < 2)
>> + init.num_parents = 0;
>> +
>> + if (init.num_parents) {
>> + parent_names = devm_kcalloc(provider->dev, init.num_parents,
>> + sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + if (!parent_names) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < init.num_parents; i++) {
>> + char *parent_name;
>> +
>> + parent_name = devm_kzalloc(provider->dev, 20,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!parent_name) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + snprintf(parent_name, 20, "%s:%d:%d",
>> + dev_name(provider->dev), sci_clk->dev_id,
>> + sci_clk->clk_id + 1 + i);
>> + parent_names[i] = parent_name;
>> +
>> + _sci_clk_get(provider, dev_id, clk_id + 1 + i, false);
>> + }
>> + init.parent_names = (const char * const *)parent_names;
>> + }
>> +
>> + init.ops = &sci_clk_ops;
>> + sci_clk->hw.init = &init;
>> +
>> + clk = devm_clk_register(provider->dev, &sci_clk->hw);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(clk);
>> + dev_err(provider->dev, "failed clk register with %d\n", ret);
>> + goto err;
>> + } else {
>> + list_add(&sci_clk->node, &provider->clocks);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return clk;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + if (parent_names) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < init.num_parents; i++)
>> + devm_kfree(provider->dev, parent_names[i]);
>> +
>> + devm_kfree(provider->dev, parent_names);
>> + }
>> +
>> + devm_kfree(provider->dev, sci_clk);
>> +
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * sci_clk_get - Xlate function for getting clock handles
>> + * @clkspec: device tree clock specifier
>> + * @data: pointer to the clock provider
>> + *
>> + * Xlate function for retrieving clock TI SCI clock handles based on
>> + * device tree clock specifier. Called from the common clock framework,
>> + * when a corresponding of_clk_get call is executed. Returns a pointer
>> + * to the TI SCI clock struct, or ERR_PTR value in failure.
>> + */
>> +static struct clk *sci_clk_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct sci_clk_provider *provider = data;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + u16 dev_id;
>> + u8 clk_id;
>> +
>> + if (clkspec->args_count != 2)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&provider->lock);
>> +
>> + dev_id = clkspec->args[0];
>> + clk_id = clkspec->args[1];
>> +
>> + clk = _sci_clk_get(provider, dev_id, clk_id, true);
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&provider->lock);
>> +
>> + return clk;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id ti_sci_clk_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "ti,sci-clk" },
>> + { /* Sentinel */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_sci_clk_of_match);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * ti_sci_clk_parse_flags - Helper function to parse clock flag arrays
>> + * @dev: clock provider device
>> + * @np: device node pointer for the clock provider
>> + * @list_name: property name containing the clocks list
>> + * @flag: flag to apply to the list of clocks
>> + *
>> + * Parses a DT list based on the provided data, and applies the flag value
>> + * for each of the clocks identified by the list. Return 0 for success,
>> + * negative error value for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int ti_sci_clk_parse_flags(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
>> + const char *list_name, u8 flag)
>> +{
>> + int num_clks;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + num_clks = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, list_name, "#clock-cells");
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
>> + struct of_phandle_args clkspec;
>> + struct clk_hw *hw;
>> + struct sci_clk *sci_clk;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list_name, "#clock-cells",
>> + i, &clkspec);
>
> Do we really need to parse the phandle and get a clk from the
> provider that is our own driver? We should be able to get a hw
> pointer by calling our xlate_hw function with the two cells
> instead and completely bypass generating a clk structure.
Will investigate this, but you are probably right. Generating the clk
structure can be bypassed at least with transition to provider->get_hw.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse %s[%d] = %d\n", list_name,
>> + i, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + clk = of_clk_get_from_provider(&clkspec);
>> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "clk_get failed for %s[%d] = %ld\n",
>> + list_name, i, PTR_ERR(clk));
>> + return PTR_ERR(clk);
>> + }
>> + hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
>> + sci_clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
>> +
>> + sci_clk->flags |= flag;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * ti_sci_clk_probe - Probe function for the TI SCI clock driver
>> + * @pdev: platform device pointer to be probed
>> + *
>> + * Probes the TI SCI clock device. Allocates a new clock provider
>> + * and registers this to the common clock framework. Also applies
>> + * any required flags to the identified clocks via clock lists
>> + * supplied from DT. Returns 0 for success, negative error value
>> + * for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int ti_sci_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> + struct sci_clk_provider *provider;
>> + const struct ti_sci_handle *handle;
>> +
>> + if (!np) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "OF data missing\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Is this ever true? Seems useless.
Probably not, the SoC this code is run on is always DT. Will drop this.
>
>> +
>> + handle = devm_ti_sci_get_handle(dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(handle))
>> + return PTR_ERR(handle);
>> +
>> + provider = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*provider), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!provider)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&provider->clocks);
>> + mutex_init(&provider->lock);
>> +
>> + provider->sci = handle;
>> + provider->ops = &handle->ops.clk_ops;
>> + provider->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + of_clk_add_provider(np, sci_clk_get, provider);
>
> This could fail.
Yea, will add error handling.
>
>> +
>> + ti_sci_clk_parse_flags(dev, np, "ti,ssc-clocks", SCI_CLK_SSC_ENABLE);
>> + ti_sci_clk_parse_flags(dev, np, "ti,allow-freq-change-clocks",
>> + SCI_CLK_ALLOW_FREQ_CHANGE);
>> + ti_sci_clk_parse_flags(dev, np, "ti,input-term-clocks",
>> + SCI_CLK_INPUT_TERMINATION);
>> +
>> + dev_info(dev, "initialized.\n");
>
> debug noise?
True, will drop.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list