[PATCH 2/2] clk: mvebu: dynamically allocate resources in Armada CP110 system controller
Stephen Boyd
sboyd at codeaurora.org
Tue Aug 30 11:43:09 PDT 2016
On 08/30, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> 2016-08-25 2:16 GMT+02:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>:
> > On 08/23, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> >> @@ -335,10 +343,12 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> cp110_clks[CP110_MAX_CORE_CLOCKS + i] = clk;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, cp110_of_clk_get, &cp110_clk_data);
> >> + ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, cp110_of_clk_get, cp110_clk_data);
> >
> > It would be nice if this could be converted to
> > of_clk_add_hw_provider().
>
> Will try it. Shouldn't such change be placed in separate commit?
Yes, of course.
>
> >
> >> if (ret)
> >> goto fail_clk_add;
> >>
> >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cp110_clks);
> >> +
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> fail_clk_add:
> >> @@ -365,6 +375,7 @@ fail0:
> >>
> >> static int cp110_syscon_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> + struct clk **cp110_clks = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > Is this variable unused now?
>
> No, why? Just below there is a loop using it. Before it was taken from
> global variable, which I got rid of.
>
Ok. I was just looking at the patch context.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list