[PATCH v2 0/9] arm64: clean up early boot function calls
Ard Biesheuvel
ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Tue Aug 30 07:50:21 PDT 2016
On 30 August 2016 at 15:48, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:35:57PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> This v2 series is a followup to the single patch #1, whose v1 I sent out
>> about a week ago.
>>
>> In a couple of places, the early boot code uses non-standard argument,
>> return value or return address registers when calling functions. This makes
>> the code more complicated than it needs to be, which was not a problem in the
>> early days, but with all the recent changes for KASLR, hibernate etc, it
>> makes sense to clean this up once and for all. This code removes all uses of
>> callee saved registers on the secondary boot and resume paths, and on th
>> primary boot path, it only leaves the necessary ones, and documents them
>> explicitly in patch #9.
>>
>> I will leave it to the honourable arm64 maintainers to decide if any of
>> these improvements weigh up against the churn, given that this code has
>> already been updated numerous times over the past couple of kernel versions.
>
> Which ones are honourable? ;)
>
> FWIW, I think that overall this is a nice improvement in legibility for
> the boot code.
>
>> Adding James to cc since patch #6 may conflict with this hibernate/
>> debug-pagealloc series [0], to which I replied that merging .idmap.text
>> with .mmuoff.text would be a worthwhile simplification.
>
> I'll leave it to you, James, and the honourable maintainers to figure
> out the details on that front.
>
Thanks. James's patches have been queued already, so I can simply
rebase onto for-next/core, with the caveat that it does not have your
KASLR TLB fix yet.
> I've given this a spin on Juno (R1) with KASAN and CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
> selected (though I have no entropy source, so I'm bailing out early).
> That all works, so for the series:
>
> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
>
> For patch 1, feel free to upgrade the Acked-by to a Reviewed-by to match
> the rest of the series.
>
Thanks a lot!
--
Ard.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list