[PATCH 1/2] clk: mvebu: set flags in CP110 gate clock
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Tue Aug 30 06:10:10 PDT 2016
Hello,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:26:48 +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c
> index 7fa42d6..0835e1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/cp110-system-controller.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static struct clk *cp110_register_gate(const char *name,
>
> init.name = name;
> init.ops = &cp110_gate_ops;
> + init.flags = CLK_IS_BASIC;
Is this really correct?
The documentation for CLK_IS_BASIC is pretty slim, but it says:
#define CLK_IS_BASIC BIT(5) /* Basic clk, can't do a to_clk_foo() */
However, we *do* have a to_clk_*() macro in this driver:
struct cp110_gate_clk {
struct clk_hw hw;
struct regmap *regmap;
u8 bit_idx;
};
#define to_cp110_gate_clk(clk) container_of(clk, struct cp110_gate_clk, hw)
If you read the commit log of commit
f7d8caadfd2813cbada82ce9041b13c38e8e5282, which introduced the flag, it
says:
clk: Add CLK_IS_BASIC flag to identify basic clocks
Most platforms end up using a mix of basic clock types and
some which use clk_hw_foo struct for filling in custom platform
information when the clocks don't fit into basic types supported.
In platform code, its useful to know if a clock is using a basic
type or clk_hw_foo, which helps platforms know if they can
safely use to_clk_hw_foo to derive the clk_hw_foo pointer from
clk_hw.
Mark all basic clocks with a CLK_IS_BASIC flag.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak at ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
We are in the case where we have our own clk_hw_foo structure, and a
to_clk_hw_foo macro to derive the clk_hw_foo from clk_hw.
According to this, the CP110 clocks are *not* basic clocks, and
therefore we shouldn't have this flag. Perhaps just the memset() is
missing.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list