[PATCH 05/33] gpio: add generic single-register fixed-direction GPIO driver
Robert Jarzmik
robert.jarzmik at free.fr
Mon Aug 29 12:39:54 PDT 2016
Hi Russell,
Russell King <rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk> writes:
> Add a simple, generic, single register fixed-direction GPIO driver.
> This is able to support a single register where a fixed number of
> bits are used for input and a fixed number of bits used for output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 6 ++
> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-reg.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/gpio-reg.h | 12 ++++
> 4 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-reg.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/gpio-reg.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index 98dd47a30fc7..49bd8b89712e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -365,6 +365,12 @@ config GPIO_RCAR
> help
> Say yes here to support GPIO on Renesas R-Car SoCs.
>
> +config GPIO_REG
> + bool
So I suppose it is on purpose you forbid it to be a module. Is there a way to
write either in the commit message or in the Kconfig this purpose, so that
nobody on "purpose" changes this bool to tristate ?
> + help
> + A 32-bit single register GPIO fixed in/out implementation. This
> + can be used to represent any register as a set of GPIO signals.
Another question I was asking myself was how it differenciated itself from
gpio-mmio, ie. what brought the need for this driver that isn't available with
gpio-mmio ?
I seem to understand that this is mainly for platform code, hence the "builtin
only" necessity, and if I'm right a part of your cover letter could very well
fit within this patch's commit message.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-reg.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-reg.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fc7e0a395f9f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-reg.c
...zip...
> +static void gpio_reg_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
> + unsigned long *bits)
> +{
> + struct gpio_reg *r = to_gpio_reg(gc);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&r->lock, flags);
> + r->out = (r->out & ~*mask) | *bits;
Shouldn't this be :
r->out = (r->out & ~*mask) | (*bits & *mask);
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio-reg.h b/include/linux/gpio-reg.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0352bec7319a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio-reg.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +#ifndef GPIO_REG_H
> +#define GPIO_REG_H
> +
> +struct device;
> +
> +struct gpio_chip *gpio_reg_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *reg,
> + int base, int num, const char *label, u32 direction, u32 def_out,
> + const char *const *names);
Maybe this one would deserve a doxygen comment ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list