[PATCH v7 08/14] arm64: numa: Use pr_fmt()

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:47PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com>
> 
> Use pr_fmt to prefix kernel output, and remove duplicated msg
> of NUMA turned off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang at huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> index d97c6e2..7b73808 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>   * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>   */
> 
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "numa: " fmt

Shouldn't this be uppercase for consistency with the existing code and
the code in places like drivers/of/of_numa.c?

>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/bootmem.h>
>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
> @@ -38,10 +40,9 @@ static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
>  {
>  	if (!opt)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3)) {
> -		pr_info("%s\n", "NUMA turned off");
> +	if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3))
>  		numa_off = true;
> -	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  early_param("numa", numa_parse_early_param);
> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
>  		set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> 
>  	/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
> -	pr_debug("NUMA: Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
> +	pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
>  }
> 
>  /*
> @@ -145,13 +146,13 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
> 
>  	ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
> +		pr_err("memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
>  			start, (end - 1), nid);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> 
>  	node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
> -	pr_info("NUMA: Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
> +	pr_info("Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
>  			start, (end - 1), nid);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -166,19 +167,18 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn)
>  	void *nd;
>  	int tnid;
> 
> -	pr_info("NUMA: Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> -			nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> -			(end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> +	pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> +		nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, (end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> 
>  	nd_pa = memblock_alloc_try_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
>  	nd = __va(nd_pa);
> 
>  	/* report and initialize */
> -	pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> +	pr_info("  NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",

Why are you adding leading whitespace?

>  		nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
>  	tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>  	if (tnid != nid)
> -		pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
> +		pr_info("    NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);


Same here.

>  	node_data[nid] = nd;
>  	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t));
> @@ -235,8 +235,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
>  			numa_distance[i * numa_distance_cnt + j] = i == j ?
>  				LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
> 
> -	pr_debug("NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n",
> -			numa_distance_cnt);
> +	pr_debug("Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", numa_distance_cnt);
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -257,20 +256,20 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
>  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
>  {
>  	if (!numa_distance) {
> -		pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n");
> +		pr_warn_once("Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
>  	if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt ||
>  			from < 0 || to < 0) {
> -		pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
> +		pr_warn_once("Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>  			    from, to, distance);
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
>  	if ((u8)distance != distance ||
>  	    (from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
> -		pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
> +		pr_warn_once("Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>  			     from, to, distance);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -297,7 +296,7 @@ static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
>  	/* Check that valid nid is set to memblks */
>  	for_each_memblock(memory, mblk)
>  		if (mblk->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || mblk->nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> -			pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> +			pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>  				mblk->nid, mblk->base,
>  				mblk->base + mblk->size - 1);
>  			return -EINVAL;
> @@ -368,9 +367,10 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
>  	struct memblock_region *mblk;
> 
>  	if (numa_off)
> -		pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
> -	pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
> -	       0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
> +		pr_warn("NUMA turned off by user\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */

Why are you changing the string? What's wrong with "NUMA turned off" like
we had before?

Will