[PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx: add SMP support for i.MX7D
Yongcai Huang
anson.huang at nxp.com
Fri Aug 26 05:20:15 PDT 2016
Best Regards!
Anson Huang
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at armlinux.org.uk]
> Sent: 2016-08-26 7:14 PM
> To: Yongcai Huang <anson.huang at nxp.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel at vger.kernel.org; shawnguo at kernel.org; kernel at pengutronix.de;
> Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at nxp.com>; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> mark.rutland at arm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx: add SMP support for i.MX7D
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 07:12:51PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> > i.MX7D has 2 cortex-a7 ARM core, add support for booting up SMP kernel
> > with 2 CPUs.
> >
> > The existing i.MX SMP code is designed for i.MX6 series SoCs which
> > have cortex-a9 ARM core, but i.MX7D has 2 cortex-a7 ARM core, so we
> > need to add runtime check for those differences between cortex-a9 and
> > cortex-a7.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/headsmp.S | 11 +++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7d.c | 2 ++
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/platsmp.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> ----
> > 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-
> imx/headsmp.S
> > index 6c28d28..a26e459 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/headsmp.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/headsmp.S
> > @@ -26,7 +26,18 @@ diag_reg_offset:
> > .endm
> >
> > ENTRY(v7_secondary_startup)
> > + .word 0xc070 @ 0xc07 is cortex-a7 id
> > + .word 0xfff0 @ mask for core type
> > +
> > ARM_BE8(setend be) @ go BE8 if entered LE
> > + mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0
> > + adr r1, v7_secondary_startup
> > + ldr r2, [r1]
> > + ldr r3, [r1, #0x4]
> > + and r0, r0, r3
> > + cmp r0, r2
> > + beq secondary_startup
> > +
>
> Total NAK on the above. There's no way that we want to even try executing
> those two .word values (and I don't care if "it works when tested", we just
> don't try and execute data.)
Sure, I misunderstood the way of putting .word, actually, for i.MX7D, I can
just call common secondary_startup instead of v7_seondary_startup, so I can
remove all changes in this file.
>
> > set_diag_reg
> > b secondary_startup
> > ENDPROC(v7_secondary_startup)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7d.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7d.c index 26ca744..ef3dce6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7d.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7d.c
> > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static void __init imx7d_init_machine(void)
> >
> > static void __init imx7d_init_irq(void) {
> > + imx_gpcv2_check_dt();
> > imx_init_revision_from_anatop();
> > imx_src_init();
> > irqchip_init();
> > @@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ static const char *const imx7d_dt_compat[]
> > __initconst = { };
> >
> > DT_MACHINE_START(IMX7D, "Freescale i.MX7 Dual (Device Tree)")
> > + .smp = smp_ops(imx_smp_ops),
> > .init_irq = imx7d_init_irq,
> > .init_machine = imx7d_init_machine,
> > .dt_compat = imx7d_dt_compat,
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/platsmp.c
> > index 711dbbd..63af911 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/platsmp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/platsmp.c
> > @@ -60,8 +60,17 @@ static int imx_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
> > struct task_struct *idle) static void __init imx_smp_init_cpus(void)
> > {
> > int i, ncores;
> > + unsigned long val, arch_type;
> >
> > - ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > + asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 0" : "=r" (arch_type));
> > +
> > + if (((arch_type >> 4) & 0xfff) == 0xc07) {
>
> This is buggy. Plus, we have macros for this. Please use the macros in
> asm/cputype.h to achieve these tests.
Thanks, I will use read_cpuid_id() API intead of putting asm code here.
>
> > + /* cortex-a7 core number is in bit[25:24] of CP15 L2CTLR */
> > + asm volatile("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2" : "=r" (val));
> > + ncores = ((val >> 24) & 0x3) + 1;
> > + } else {
> > + ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = ncores; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
> > set_cpu_possible(i, false);
> > @@ -74,6 +83,14 @@ void imx_smp_prepare(void)
> >
> > static void __init imx_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) {
> > + unsigned long arch_type;
> > +
> > + asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 0" : "=r" (arch_type));
> > +
> > + /* no need for cortex-a7 */
> > + if (((arch_type >> 4) & 0xfff) == 0xc07)
>
> Ditto.
Ditto.
>
> > + return;
> > +
> > imx_smp_prepare();
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c index
> > 70b083f..1fda72a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #include <linux/smp.h>
> > #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> > #include "common.h"
> > +#include "hardware.h"
> >
> > #define SRC_SCR 0x000
> > #define SRC_GPR1 0x020
> > @@ -30,6 +31,15 @@
> > #define BP_SRC_SCR_CORE1_RST 14
> > #define BP_SRC_SCR_CORE1_ENABLE 22
> >
> > +/* below are for i.MX7D */
> > +#define SRC_GPR1_V2 0x074
> > +#define SRC_A7RCR0 0x004
> > +#define SRC_A7RCR1 0x008
> > +#define SRC_M4RCR 0x00C
> > +
> > +#define BP_SRC_A7RCR0_A7_CORE_RESET0 0
> > +#define BP_SRC_A7RCR1_A7_CORE1_ENABLE 1
> > +
> > static void __iomem *src_base;
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(scr_lock);
> >
> > @@ -87,12 +97,21 @@ void imx_enable_cpu(int cpu, bool enable)
> > u32 mask, val;
> >
> > cpu = cpu_logical_map(cpu);
> > - mask = 1 << (BP_SRC_SCR_CORE1_ENABLE + cpu - 1);
> > spin_lock(&scr_lock);
> > - val = readl_relaxed(src_base + SRC_SCR);
> > - val = enable ? val | mask : val & ~mask;
> > - val |= 1 << (BP_SRC_SCR_CORE1_RST + cpu - 1);
> > - writel_relaxed(val, src_base + SRC_SCR);
> > + if (cpu_is_imx7d()) {
>
> It's about time iMX folk learned that "imx*" is a SoC and _not_ a CPU.
> It should be "soc_is_imx7d()" because we're wanting to know whether the
> _SoC_ is an iMX7D. The _CPU_ is a _Cortex-A7_.
Agree, I will add a new patch in this patch set to replace all the cpu_is_xxx with
Soc_is_xxx.
Thanks for review.
Anson.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list