[Patch v4 8/9] driver/edac/layerscape_edac: Add Layerscape EDAC support
york sun
york.sun at nxp.com
Tue Aug 23 09:46:10 PDT 2016
On 08/12/2016 02:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:55:45PM -0700, York Sun wrote:
>> Add DDR EDAC for ARM-based compatible controllers. Both big-endian
>> and little-endian are supported, as specified in device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Change log
>> v4: Drop adding atomic_scrub() for arm64
>> Drop NO_IRQ
>> v3: no change
>> v2: Create new driver using shared DDR object
>>
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
>> drivers/edac/Kconfig | 7 +++++
>> drivers/edac/Makefile | 3 ++
>> drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> index 7ef1d05..185a215 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ config ARCH_EXYNOS
>>
>> config ARCH_LAYERSCAPE
>> bool "ARMv8 based Freescale Layerscape SoC family"
>> + select EDAC_SUPPORT
>> help
>> This enables support for the Freescale Layerscape SoC family.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Kconfig b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> index 6ca7474..f1ac4e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> @@ -258,6 +258,13 @@ config EDAC_MPC85XX
>> Support for error detection and correction on the Freescale
>> MPC8349, MPC8560, MPC8540, MPC8548, T4240
>>
>> +config EDAC_LAYERSCAPE
>> + tristate "Freescale Layerscape DDR"
>> + depends on EDAC_MM_EDAC && ARCH_LAYERSCAPE
>> + help
>> + Support for error detection and correction on Freescale memory
>> + controllers on Layerscape SoCs.
>> +
>> config EDAC_MV64X60
>> tristate "Marvell MV64x60"
>> depends on EDAC_MM_EDAC && MV64X60
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Makefile b/drivers/edac/Makefile
>> index ee047a4..910dc83 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/Makefile
>> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_PASEMI) += pasemi_edac.o
>> mpc85xx_edac_mod-y := fsl_ddr_edac.o mpc85xx_edac.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_MPC85XX) += mpc85xx_edac_mod.o
>>
>> +layerscape_edac_mod-y := fsl_ddr_edac.o layerscape_edac.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_LAYERSCAPE) += layerscape_edac_mod.o
>> +
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_MV64X60) += mv64x60_edac.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_CELL) += cell_edac.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_PPC4XX) += ppc4xx_edac.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
>> index d8ce1f6..afade14 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include "edac_module.h"
>> #include "edac_core.h"
>> #include "fsl_ddr_edac.h"
>> @@ -478,7 +479,6 @@ int fsl_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>>
>> pdata = mci->pvt_info;
>> pdata->name = "fsl_mc_err";
>> - pdata->irq = NO_IRQ;
>> mci->pdev = &op->dev;
>> pdata->edac_idx = edac_mc_idx++;
>> dev_set_drvdata(mci->pdev, mci);
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c b/drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6ba771d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Freescale Memory Controller kernel module
>> + *
>> + * Derived from mpc85xx_edac.c
>
> Up to here is fine...
>
>> + * Author: Dave Jiang <djiang at mvista.com>
>> + *
>> + * 2006-2007 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under
>> + * the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. This program
>> + * is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any kind, whether express
>> + * or implied.
>> + */
>
> ... but I'm not sure about this. This is a new driver which you are
> adding and not Dave. You probably could say
>
> "Author: York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>
> (c) NXP ...
>
> Derived from mpc85xx_edac.c, (c) Montavista ..."
>
> so that we have both copyright tags in there.
>
Sorry for the late response. I was out of office last week. Will respin
this patch.
>> +
>> +#include "edac_core.h"
>> +#include "fsl_ddr_edac.h"
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id fsl_ddr_mc_err_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "fsl,qoriq-memory-controller", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_ddr_mc_err_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver fsl_ddr_mc_err_driver = {
>> + .probe = fsl_mc_err_probe,
>> + .remove = fsl_mc_err_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "fsl_ddr_mc_err",
>> + .of_match_table = fsl_ddr_mc_err_of_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init fsl_ddr_mc_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int res = 0;
>
> No need to init it since it is going to be overwritten anyway.
OK.
>
>> +
>> + /* make sure error reporting method is sane */
>> + switch (edac_op_state) {
>> + case EDAC_OPSTATE_POLL:
>> + case EDAC_OPSTATE_INT:
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + edac_op_state = EDAC_OPSTATE_INT;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res = platform_driver_register(&fsl_ddr_mc_err_driver);
>> + if (res) {
>> + pr_err("Layerscape EDAC: MC fails to register\n");
>
> This is done with pr_fmt(). Grep the tree for examples.
>
> You could define EDAC_MOD_STR like the rest of the drivers do.
>
Will fix.
>
>
>> + return res;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(fsl_ddr_mc_init);
>> +
>> +static void __exit fsl_ddr_mc_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + platform_driver_unregister(&fsl_ddr_mc_err_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_exit(fsl_ddr_mc_exit);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Montavista Software, Inc.");
>
> See above.
Will fix.
>
>> +module_param(edac_op_state, int, 0444);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_op_state,
>> + "EDAC Error Reporting state: 0=Poll, 2=Interrupt");
>> --
>
York
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list