[PATCH soc/next?] ARM: BCM53573: Initial support for Broadcom BCM53573 SoCs

Florian Fainelli f.fainelli at gmail.com
Sun Aug 21 09:49:34 PDT 2016


On August 16, 2016 12:39:49 PM PDT, "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 16 August 2016 at 19:52, Jon Mason <jon.mason at broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
>>>
>>> BCM53573 series is a new family with embedded wireless. By marketing
>>> people it's sometimes called Northstar but it uses different CPU and
>has
>>> different architecture so we need a new symbol for it.
>>> Fortunately it shares some peripherals with other iProc based SoCs
>so we
>>> will be able to reuse some drivers/bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
>>> ---
>>> Resending as linux-arm-kernel ML rejected my e-mail due to the wrong
>address:
>>> bcm-kernel-feedback-list at broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>>  MAINTAINERS               |  7 +++++++
>>>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 7304d2e..9e2db2e 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -2517,6 +2517,13 @@ F:       arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_5301x.c
>>>  F:     arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
>>>  F:     arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm470*
>>>
>>> +BROADCOM BCM53573 ARM ARCHITECTURE
>>> +M:     Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
>>> +L:     linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> +S:     Maintained
>>> +F:     arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm53573*
>>> +F:     arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47189*
>>> +
>>>  BROADCOM BCM63XX ARM ARCHITECTURE
>>>  M:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
>>>  L:     linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for
>non-subscribers)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>> index 5832dba..9a6c3ae 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -76,6 +76,21 @@ config ARCH_BCM_5301X
>>>           different SoC or with the older BCM47XX and BCM53XX based
>>>           network SoC using a MIPS CPU, they are supported by
>arch/mips/bcm47xx
>>>
>>> +config ARCH_BCM_53573
>>> +       bool "Broadcom BCM53573 SoC series support"
>>> +       depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
>>> +       select ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>> +       select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>>> +
>>> +       help
>>> +         BCM53573 series is set of SoCs using ARM Cortex-A7 CPUs
>with wireless
>>> +         embedded in the chipset.
>>> +         This SoC line is mostly used in home routers and is some
>cheaper
>>> +         alternative for Northstar family.
>>> +
>>> +         The base chip is BCM53573 and there are some packaging
>modifications
>>> +         like BCM47189 and BCM47452.
>>> +
>>
>> This will put it under the "iProc" section.  I think we would want it
>> under the "Other Architectures" section.
>
>Oh, we're still having some miscommunication here. I did this choice
>based on Ray's e-mail where he said it's SoC sharing peripherals with
>iProc ones:
>
>On 10 August 2016 at 19:44, Ray Jui <ray.jui at broadcom.com> wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, I searched the datasheet and found this is a
>wireless
>> router SoC done by the WLAN team. It happens to share some
>peripherals with
>> other iProc based SoCs.
>
>Is this wrong then? Ray?

What both Ray and Jon said does not contradict with each other, this platform uses some iProc peripherals (supposedly why the Broadcom SDK shows it as a Northstar), but is not a genuine iProc architecture as defined for e.g NS/NSP/NS2.

For consistency it sounds like we would want this symbol in Other architectures since only a few iProc peripherals are used.


-- 
Florian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list