[PATCH] mm, numa: boot cpu should bound to the node0 when node_off enable
Ganapatrao Kulkarni
gpkulkarni at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 10:45:41 PDT 2016
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:09:26PM +0800, zhongjiang wrote:
>> At present, boot cpu will bound to a node from device tree when node_off enable.
>> if the node is not initialization, it will lead to a following problem.
>>
>> next_zones_zonelist+0x18/0x80
>> __build_all_zonelists+0x1e0/0x288
>> build_all_zonelists_init+0x10/0x1c
>> build_all_zonelists+0x114/0x128
>> start_kernel+0x1a0/0x414
>
> I think this "problem" is missing a lot of information. Is this supposed
> to be a kernel panic?
>
>> The patch fix it by fallback to node 0. therefore, the cpu will bound to the node
>> correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhongjiang <zhongjiang at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> index 4dcd7d6..1f8f5da 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu)
>> void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
>> {
>> /* fallback to node 0 */
>> - if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES)
>> + if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || numa_off)
i did not understood how this line change fixes the issue that you
have mentioned (i too not understood fully the issue description)
this array used while mapping node id when secondary cores comes up
when numa_off is set the cpu_to_node_map[cpu] is not used and set to
node0 always( refer function numa_store_cpu_info)..
please provide more details to understand the issue you are facing.
/*
* Set the cpu to node and mem mapping
*/
void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu)
{
map_cpu_to_node(cpu, numa_off ? 0 : cpu_to_node_map[cpu]);
}
thanks
Ganapat
>> nid = 0;
>>
>> cpu_to_node_map[cpu] = nid;
>
> The patch looks fine (slight inconsistence from the map_cpu_to_node()
> callers but I guess we don't want to expose numa_off outside this file).
> I would however like to see an Ack from Ganapat (cc'ed).
>
> --
> Catalin
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list