[PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Rework obtaining a rproc from a DT phandle
Bjorn Andersson
bjorn.andersson at linaro.org
Wed Aug 10 10:15:46 PDT 2016
On Tue 19 Jul 08:49 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> In this patch we;
> - Use a subsystem generic phandle to obtain an rproc
> - We have to support TI's bespoke version for the time being
> - Convert wkup_m3_ipc driver to new API
> - Rename the call to be more like other, similar OF calls
> - Move feature-not-enabled inline stub to the headers
> - Strip out duplicate code by calling into of_get_rproc_by_index()
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 41 ++++++++----------------------------
> drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c | 14 +++---------
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c b/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c
> index 8823cc8..15481f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c
> @@ -385,7 +385,6 @@ static int wkup_m3_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> int irq, ret;
> - phandle rproc_phandle;
> struct rproc *m3_rproc;
> struct resource *res;
> struct task_struct *task;
> @@ -430,16 +429,9 @@ static int wkup_m3_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(m3_ipc->mbox);
> }
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,rproc", &rproc_phandle)) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get rproc phandle\n");
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_free_mbox;
> - }
> -
> - m3_rproc = rproc_get_by_phandle(rproc_phandle);
> - if (!m3_rproc) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get rproc handle\n");
> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + m3_rproc = of_get_rproc_by_phandle(dev->of_node);
> + if (IS_ERR(m3_rproc)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(m3_rproc);
> goto err_free_mbox;
> }
>
Santosh, do you have any objections to me merging this?
of_get_rproc_by_phandle() will fall back and attempt to acquire the
handle from ti,rproc if the generic "rprocs" property doesn't exist.
Regards,
Bjorn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list