[PATCH] Added perf functionality to mmdc driver
Peter Zijlstra
peterz at infradead.org
Fri Aug 5 07:40:19 PDT 2016
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:25AM -0500, Zhengyu Shen wrote:
> $ perf stat -e mmdc/busy-cycles/,mmdc/read-accesses/,mmdc/read-bytes/,mmdc/total-cycles/,mmdc/write-accesses/,mmdc/write-bytes/ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5000
> Performance counter stats for 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5000':
>
> 898021787 mmdc/busy-cycles/
> 14819600 mmdc/read-accesses/
> 471.30 MB mmdc/read-bytes/
> 2815419216 mmdc/total-cycles/
> 13367354 mmdc/write-accesses/
> 427.76 MB mmdc/write-bytes/
>
> 5.334757334 seconds time elapsed
This Changelog fails to explain why. Or even wth mmdc is.
> @@ -61,7 +249,22 @@ static int imx_mmdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> __func__);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> + pmu_mmdc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmdc_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pmu_mmdc) {
> + pr_err("failed to allocate PMU device!\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
whitespace fail
> + mmdc_pmu_init(pmu_mmdc, mmdc_base);
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu_mmdc);
> + perf_pmu_register(&(pmu_mmdc->pmu), "mmdc", -1);
This seems to suggest there can be multiple mmdc thingies, should the
name reflect this?
> + return 0;
> +}
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list