[PATCH 0001/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Pavel Machek
pavel at ucw.cz
Tue Aug 2 10:42:54 PDT 2016
Hi!
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> -core_param(no_bL_switcher, no_bL_switcher, bool, 0644);
> +core_param(no_bL_switcher, no_bL_switcher, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
Everyone knows what 0644 is, but noone can read S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR |
S_IRCRP | S_IROTH (*). Please don't do this.
Pavel
(*) I deliberately included an error there. Did you spot the error?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list