pci_ioremap_set_mem_type(), pci_remap_iospace()
Bjorn Helgaas
helgaas at kernel.org
Thu Apr 28 07:33:32 PDT 2016
[+cc linux-pci, manually inserted reply, sorry again]
Liviu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:58:27PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Looking at __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller() makes me
>> suspect that pci_remap_iospace() is not safe on arm.
> Hmm, not sure how you reached that conclusion. __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller()
> does call in the end ioremap_page_range() for ARMv7 || ARM_LPAE, which is
> what pci_remap_iospace() does as well. Beside the possibly different
> pgprot_t values, what would make it unsafe for arm?
The different pgprot_t is exactly what I'm worried about. The callers of
pci_ioremap_io() probably get the right thing (a pgprot tweaked to deal
with this Cortex problem), but other callers of ioremap_page_range(),
pci_remap_iospace() in particular, don't get that tweak:
pci_ioremap_io
ioremap_page_range(..., __pgprot(get_mem_type(pci_ioremap_mem_type)->prot_pte))
pci_remap_iospace
ioremap_page_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
ioremap_pud_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
ioremap_pmd_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
ioremap_pte_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
set_pte_at(..., pfn_pte(pfn, pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL)))
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list