[PATCH net v3 1/5] drivers: net: cpsw: fix parsing of phy-handle DT property in dual_emac config

David Rivshin (Allworx) drivshin.allworx at gmail.com
Wed Apr 27 18:25:25 PDT 2016


From: David Rivshin <drivshin at allworx.com>

Commit 9e42f715264ff158478fa30eaed847f6e131366b ("drivers: net: cpsw: add
phy-handle parsing") saved the "phy-handle" phandle into a new cpsw_priv
field. However, phy connections are per-slave, so the phy_node field should
be in cpsw_slave_data rather than cpsw_priv.

This would go unnoticed in a single emac configuration. But in dual_emac
mode, the last "phy-handle" property parsed for either slave would be used
by both of them, causing them both to refer to the same phy_device.

Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing")
Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin at allworx.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody at cambrionix.com>
Reviewed-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com>
---
I would suggest this for -stable. It should apply cleanly as far back
as 4.4.

Changes since v2 [1]:
- Added Tested-by from Andrew Goodbody [3]
- Added Reviewed-by from Mugunthan V N [4]
- Added Reviewed-by from Grygorii Strashko [5]

Changes since v1 [2]:
- Rebased (no conflicts)
- Added Tested-by from Nicolas Chauvet

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/613237/
[2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/560326/
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/22/537
[4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/22/63
[5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/22/496


 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 13 ++++++-------
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index bbb77cd..ce0b0ca 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -363,15 +363,14 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave *slave, u32 val, u32 offset)
 	__raw_writel(val, slave->regs + offset);
 }
 
 struct cpsw_priv {
 	spinlock_t			lock;
 	struct platform_device		*pdev;
 	struct net_device		*ndev;
-	struct device_node		*phy_node;
 	struct napi_struct		napi_rx;
 	struct napi_struct		napi_tx;
 	struct device			*dev;
 	struct cpsw_platform_data	data;
 	struct cpsw_ss_regs __iomem	*regs;
 	struct cpsw_wr_regs __iomem	*wr_regs;
 	u8 __iomem			*hw_stats;
@@ -1144,16 +1143,16 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
 
 	if (priv->data.dual_emac)
 		cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(priv, slave, slave_port);
 	else
 		cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
 				   1 << slave_port, 0, 0, ALE_MCAST_FWD_2);
 
-	if (priv->phy_node)
-		slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, priv->phy_node,
+	if (slave->data->phy_node)
+		slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node,
 				 &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if);
 	else
 		slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id,
 				 &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if);
 	if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) {
 		dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d\n",
 			slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num);
@@ -1936,20 +1935,19 @@ static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
 
 	slave->data	= data;
 	slave->regs	= regs + slave_reg_ofs;
 	slave->sliver	= regs + sliver_reg_ofs;
 	slave->port_vlan = data->dual_emac_res_vlan;
 }
 
-static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_priv *priv,
+static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data,
 			 struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	struct device_node *slave_node;
-	struct cpsw_platform_data *data = &priv->data;
 	int i = 0, ret;
 	u32 prop;
 
 	if (!node)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "slaves", &prop)) {
@@ -2029,15 +2027,16 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_priv *priv,
 		int lenp;
 		const __be32 *parp;
 
 		/* This is no slave child node, continue */
 		if (strcmp(slave_node->name, "slave"))
 			continue;
 
-		priv->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(slave_node, "phy-handle", 0);
+		slave_data->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(slave_node,
+							"phy-handle", 0);
 		parp = of_get_property(slave_node, "phy_id", &lenp);
 		if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(slave_node)) {
 			struct device_node *phy_node;
 			struct phy_device *phy_dev;
 
 			/* In the case of a fixed PHY, the DT node associated
 			 * to the PHY is the Ethernet MAC DT node.
@@ -2271,15 +2270,15 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * This may be required here for child devices.
 	 */
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
 
 	/* Select default pin state */
 	pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(&pdev->dev);
 
-	if (cpsw_probe_dt(priv, pdev)) {
+	if (cpsw_probe_dt(&priv->data, pdev)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cpsw: platform data missing\n");
 		ret = -ENODEV;
 		goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
 	}
 	data = &priv->data;
 
 	if (is_valid_ether_addr(data->slave_data[0].mac_addr)) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h
index 442a703..e50afd1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h
@@ -14,14 +14,15 @@
 #ifndef __CPSW_H__
 #define __CPSW_H__
 
 #include <linux/if_ether.h>
 #include <linux/phy.h>
 
 struct cpsw_slave_data {
+	struct device_node *phy_node;
 	char		phy_id[MII_BUS_ID_SIZE];
 	int		phy_if;
 	u8		mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
 	u16		dual_emac_res_vlan;	/* Reserved VLAN for DualEMAC */
 };
 
 struct cpsw_platform_data {
-- 
2.5.5




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list