[RFC] Is /dev/port useful on arm64?
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Mon Apr 25 15:43:16 PDT 2016
On Monday 25 April 2016 16:35:04 Al Stone wrote:
>
> However, /dev/port is used for both ISA and PCI IO ports. So, this led me
> to what may be a dumb question: is there really a need for PCI support in
> /dev/port for arm64?
>
> Supporting ISA just seems silly, at least from an ARMv8 server standpoint,
> but PCI is less clear to me. Anyone have opinions one way or the other?
Hisilicon has an ISA-like bus in their system, in form of LPC.
> It seems like it would be a waste of time to do the work to make sure the
> PCI ports work correctly only to find out they will never be used, but I
> can't think of anyone that actually needs them.
I think we should change the /dev/port implementation to interact with
the architecture code so it knows which addresses have been registered
through pci_ioremap_io to ensure that accessing it at least doesn't
predictably crash the kernel.
Aside from that, most distros probably want to disable it anyway along
with /dev/mem, but an embedded user can access the two if they absolutely
need to.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list