[PATCH V3 14/18] coresight: tmc: keep track of memory width
Suzuki K Poulose
Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com
Mon Apr 25 08:09:55 PDT 2016
On 25/04/16 15:55, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 25 April 2016 at 08:41, Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com> wrote:
>> On 22/04/16 18:14, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>>
>>> Accessing the HW configuration register each time the memory
>>> width is needed simply doesn't make sense. It is much more
>>> efficient to read the value once and keep a reference for
>>> later use.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 14 +---------
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c | 34
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h | 10 +++++---
>>> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>>> index cc88c15ba45c..981c5ca75e36 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>>> @@ -41,25 +41,13 @@ void tmc_etb_enable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>>
>>> static void tmc_etb_dump_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>> {
>>> - enum tmc_mem_intf_width memwidth;
>>> - u8 memwords;
>>> char *bufp;
>>> u32 read_data;
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> - memwidth = BMVAL(readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + CORESIGHT_DEVID),
>>> 8, 10);
>>> - if (memwidth == TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_32BITS)
>>> - memwords = 1;
>>> - else if (memwidth == TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_64BITS)
>>> - memwords = 2;
>>> - else if (memwidth == TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_128BITS)
>>> - memwords = 4;
>>> - else
>>> - memwords = 8;
>>> -
>>> bufp = drvdata->buf;
>>> while (1) {
>>> - for (i = 0; i < memwords; i++) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->memwidth; i++) {
>>> read_data = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base +
>>> TMC_RRD);
>>> if (read_data == 0xFFFFFFFF)
>>> return;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c
>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c
>>> index 55806352b1f1..cb030a09659d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c
>>> @@ -193,6 +193,39 @@ static const struct file_operations tmc_fops = {
>>> .llseek = no_llseek,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static enum tmc_mem_intf_width tmc_get_memwidth(u32 devid)
>>> +{
>>> + enum tmc_mem_intf_width memwidth;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Excerpt from the TRM:
>>> + *
>>> + * DEVID::MEMWIDTH[10:8]
>>> + * 0x2 Memory interface databus is 32 bits wide.
>>> + * 0x3 Memory interface databus is 64 bits wide.
>>> + * 0x4 Memory interface databus is 128 bits wide.
>>> + * 0x5 Memory interface databus is 256 bits wide.
>>> + */
>>> + switch (BMVAL(devid, 8, 10)) {
>>> + case 0x2:
>>> + memwidth = TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_32BITS;
>>> + break;
>>> + case 0x3:
>>> + memwidth = TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_64BITS;
>>> + break;
>>> + case 0x4:
>>> + memwidth = TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_128BITS;
>>> + break;
>>> + case 0x5:
>>> + memwidth = TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_256BITS;
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + memwidth = 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return memwidth;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> #define coresight_tmc_simple_func(name, offset) \
>>> coresight_simple_func(struct tmc_drvdata, name, offset)
>>>
>>> @@ -306,6 +339,7 @@ static int tmc_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const
>>> struct amba_id *id)
>>>
>>> devid = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + CORESIGHT_DEVID);
>>> drvdata->config_type = BMVAL(devid, 6, 7);
>>> + drvdata->memwidth = tmc_get_memwidth(devid);
>>>
>>> if (drvdata->config_type == TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETR) {
>>> if (np)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>>> index 9b4c215d2b6b..12a097f3d06c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>>> @@ -81,10 +81,10 @@ enum tmc_mode {
>>> };
>>>
>>> enum tmc_mem_intf_width {
>>> - TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_32BITS = 0x2,
>>> - TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_64BITS = 0x3,
>>> - TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_128BITS = 0x4,
>>> - TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_256BITS = 0x5,
>>> + TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_32BITS = 1,
>>> + TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_64BITS = 2,
>>> + TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_128BITS = 4,
>>> + TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_256BITS = 8,
>>> };
>>
>>
>> I think this would cause confusion for the reader. It would be good to
>> leave the definitions above as before and tmc_get_memwidth() doing:
>>
>> i.e,
>> case TMC_MEM_INTF_WIDTH_32BITS:
>> memwidth = 1;
>> break;
>>
>> But we still store the memwidth in bytes.
>
> If we proceed this way we have to do a case statement on hard coded
> values (or introduce a new enumeration) in tmc_update_etf_buffer(). In
But then we are doing that already with this patch in tmc_get_memwidth already.
My point is, we expect named symbols for values defined in the standards, so that
you don't make a mistake when dealing with them. It is really difficult to track
down a bug if we do make a mistake.
> my opinion the current solution scales better.
I would prefer doing a hardcoded check in tmc_update_etf_buffer() like :
+ /*
+ * The value written to RRP must be byte-address aligned to
+ * the width of the trace memory databus _and_ to a frame
+ * boundary (16 byte), whichever is the biggest. For example,
+ * for 32-bit, 64-bit and 128-bit wide trace memory, the four
+ * LSBs must be 0s. For 256-bit wide trace memory, the five
+ * LSBs must be 0s.
+ */
+ if (drvdata->memwidth == 8)
+ mask = GENMASK(31, 6);
+ else
+ mask = GENMASK(31, 5);
Suzuki
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list