[PATCH] make dt_scan_depth1_nodes more readable

Stefano Stabellini sstabellini at kernel.org
Mon Apr 25 04:04:53 PDT 2016


On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:25:11AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> > 
> > Improve the readability of dt_scan_depth1_nodes by removing the nested
> > conditionals.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini at kernel.org>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Note: this patch is based on xentip/for-linus-4.7
> 
> So how should I merge it? :/

I think that if you would like to merge it, it would be easier this time
for me to carry it in my tree. Otherwise you would have to base your
for-linus-4.7 on xentip/for-linus-4.7 and send the pull request after
the Xen pull request -- undesirable.


> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> > index 57ee317..6884c76 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> > @@ -66,17 +66,24 @@ static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node,
> >  				       void *data)
> >  {
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Return 1 as soon as we encounter a node at depth 1 that is
> > -	 * not the /chosen node, or /hypervisor node with compatible
> > -	 * string "xen,xen".
> > +	 * Ignore anything not directly under the root node; we'll
> > +	 * catch its parent instead.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (depth == 1 && (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0)) {
> > -		if (strcmp(uname, "hypervisor") != 0 ||
> > -		    !of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "xen,xen"))
> > -			return 1;
> > -	}
> > +	if (depth != 1)
> > +		return 0;
> >  
> > -	return 0;
> > +	if (strcmp(uname, "chosen") == 0)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (strcmp(uname, "hypervisor") == 0 &&
> > +	    of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "xen,xen"))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This node at depth 1 is neither a chosen node nor a xen node,
> > +	 * which we do not expect.
> > +	 */
> > +	return 1;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > 
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list