[PATCH v6 00/11] soc: renesas: Add R-Car SYSC PM Domain Support

[Simon Horman]

Hi Laurent, Hi Geert,

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:12:23AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Friday 22 Apr 2016 10:33:11 Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 05:14:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > >> This patch series introduces a DT-based driver for the R-Car System
> > > >> Controller, as found on Renesas R-Car H1, R-Car Gen2, and R-Car Gen3
> > > >> SoCs.
> > > >> 
> > > >> This is a dependency for the enablement of DU and VSP on R-Car H3, as
> > > >> the VSPs are located in a PM Domain.

[...]

> > I do wonder, as we are almost at the closing point for queuing up changes
> > for v4.7 if, assuming the above patches are scheduled for inclusion in
> > v4.7-rc1, it might not be better for me to queue up this series for v4.8.
> 
> Then that would delay a bunch of multimedia patch by one more kernel cycle, 
> which I was hoping to avoid.

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:02:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 05:14:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> >> This patch series introduces a DT-based driver for the R-Car System
> >> >> Controller, as found on Renesas R-Car H1, R-Car Gen2, and R-Car Gen3
> >> >> SoCs.
> >> >>
> >> >> This is a dependency for the enablement of DU and VSP on R-Car H3, as
> >> >> the VSPs are located in a PM Domain.

[...]

> > To my mind I need some kind of assurance from the clk maintainers that the
> > patches are stable there - in particular that the commit ids won't change.
> 
> As the clock maintainer pulled the same tag instead of applying emailed
> patches, the commit IDs won't change, even if he has to rework the clk-next
> branch and repull.
> 
> > And that both they and the ARM-SoC maintainers are happy with me pulling
> > it into my tree for this purpose.
> 
> I also mentioned that in the pull request. Pulling in a stable branch is
> standard procedure: the code fails to compile if you don't merge
> tags/clk-renesas-for-v4.7-tag2 first.
> 
> > I do wonder, as we are almost at the closing point for queuing up changes
> > for v4.7 if, assuming the above patches are scheduled for inclusion in
> > v4.7-rc1, it might not be better for me to queue up this series for v4.8.
> >
> > I could do that sooner rather than later in the devel branch of the renesas
> > tree if you like.
> 
> v4.7-rc1 is still more than one month in the future.
> 
> As Laurent said, that would delay multimedia work by one more kernel cycle,
> as R-Car SYSC PM Domains already missed v4.6.
> In addition, it would mean continued rebasing/updating of "[PATCH v5 00/12]
> ARM/arm64: dts: rcar: Add SYSC PM domains" in renesas-drivers, as it touches
> all R-Car DTSes all over the place.
> 
> Thanks for reconsidering!

Thanks for your feedback. I now have a better understanding of the
situation both in regards to the state of the branch and the dependencies
on it.

I have reconsidered and queued up this series for v4.7.
It is now present in the next branch of the renesas tree.