[PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma

[Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao]

Hi Lars,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:lars at metafoo.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:45 PM
> To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad at xilinx.com>; Shubhrajyoti Datta
> <shubhrajyoti.datta at gmail.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com>;
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>; Ian Campbell
> <ijc+devicetree at hellion.org.uk>; Kumar Gala <galak at codeaurora.org>; Michal
> Simek <michals at xilinx.com>; Soren Brinkmann <sorenb at xilinx.com>;
> vinod.koul at intel.com; dan.j.williams at intel.com; Moritz Fischer
> <moritz.fischer at ettus.com>; Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>; luis at debethencourt.com; Anirudha
> Sarangi <anirudh at xilinx.com>; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> <punnaia at xilinx.com>; dmaengine at vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma
> 
> On 04/20/2016 10:39 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> [...]
> >> however  we should keep the names same as the TRM.
> >
> > Why?? Why can't we use simple convenient names that refers to
> > equivalent clocks of h/w
> 
> Because it is confusing. If you use the same name it's very straight forward to
> understand which clock is being referred to. That's not the case if you come up
> with random new names.

Ok will fix in the v2...

Regards,
Kedar.