[PATCH v7 04/16] arm64: kvm: Move the do_el2_call macro to a header file
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Apr 19 08:10:16 PDT 2016
On 19/04/16 16:05, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 19/04/16 16:02, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 01/04/16 17:53, James Morse wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
>>> index 9f22dd607958..b8fdddeca71b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
>>> @@ -21,7 +21,23 @@
>>> #define BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL1 (0xe11)
>>> #define BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL2 (0xe12)
>>>
>>> -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>> +#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
>>> +.macro do_el2_call
>>> + /*
>>> + * Shuffle the parameters before calling the function
>>> + * pointed to in x0. Assumes parameters in x[1,2,3].
>>> + */
>>> + sub sp, sp, #16
>>> + str lr, [sp]
>>> + mov lr, x0
>>> + mov x0, x1
>>> + mov x1, x2
>>> + mov x2, x3
>>> + blr lr
>>> + ldr lr, [sp]
>>> + add sp, sp, #16
>>> +.endm
>>> +#else
>>
>> So while I'm not opposed to this macro being reused, the name is
>> slightly misleading out of the original context. This macro doesn't take
>> you to EL2, but implements a very peculiar calling convention that only
>> the HYP code is expecting.
>
> Ah, I hadn't thought of it like that!
>
>
>> Could we have a disclaimer saying something along the lines of "Don't
>> you dare using this macro!"?
>
> Or rename it? Something like 'unpack_el2_call'.
Works for me!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list