[PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through devicetree
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Tue Apr 19 02:51:00 PDT 2016
On 19 April 2016 at 11:42, Olliver Schinagl <oliver at schinagl.nl> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On 19-04-16 11:29, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> On 19 April 2016 at 09:12, Olliver Schinagl <oliver at schinagl.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>> In patch 81f8a7be66 Hans de Goede added a patch to allow marking an mmc
>>> device as to having an broken HPI implementation. After talking some
>>> with Hans, we now think it is actually the mmc controller that can be
>>> broken and not support broken HPI's.
>>
>> I don't want us to invent a DT binding for something you *think* is a
>> HW controller issue.
>>
>> Have you really excluded that this isn't a software issue? Me
>> personally haven't been using HPI that much so I can't really tell
>> about the code robustness from the mmc core (mmc protocol point of
>> view).
>
> Well this patch goes hand in hand so to speak with the broken-hpi patch
> introduced by him, he did most of the investigation. We just discussed how
> to handle it and asked me to cook up the patch.
Well, my point is that it's more understandable about having a broken
HPI implementation for eMMC cards, but for host controllers I am not
so sure.
I don't think there is an electrical change required by the host
controller to support HPI, is just like any other command, right?
Unless I am missing something, of course.
Kind regards
Uffe
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list