[PATCH v2] arm64: Reduce verbosity on SMP CPU stop
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Mon Apr 18 05:19:31 PDT 2016
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:43:33AM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:37:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > You can remove stop_lock altogether now, right? I also wonder whether
> > it would be worth printing out which CPUs are still online in the case where
> > we fail to stop all the secondaries?
>
> Sorry, I've been a bit offline. Yes, the stop_lock can also be removed.
>
> How about below patch that prints the CPU ids for all CPUs that failed
> to stop?
Yeah, this looks better, thanks. We might want to clear the "stopper"
CPU from the mask, but it's hard to really care that much.
Will
>
> Jan
>
> --------------------------------
>
> When CPUs are stopped during an abnormal operation like panic
> for each CPU a line is printed and the stack trace is dumped.
>
> This information is only interesting for the aborting CPU
> and on systems with many CPUs it only makes it harder to
> debug if after the aborting CPU the log is flooded with data
> about all other CPUs too.
>
> Therefore remove the stack dump and printk of other CPUs
> and only print a single line that the other CPUs are going to be
> stopped and, in case any CPUs remain online list them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber at cavium.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index b2d5f4e..29f4e37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -763,21 +763,11 @@ void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(stop_lock);
> -
> /*
> * ipi_cpu_stop - handle IPI from smp_send_stop()
> */
> static void ipi_cpu_stop(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING ||
> - system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> - raw_spin_lock(&stop_lock);
> - pr_crit("CPU%u: stopping\n", cpu);
> - dump_stack();
> - raw_spin_unlock(&stop_lock);
> - }
> -
> set_cpu_online(cpu, false);
>
> local_irq_disable();
> @@ -872,6 +862,9 @@ void smp_send_stop(void)
> cpumask_copy(&mask, cpu_online_mask);
> cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>
> + if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING ||
> + system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> + pr_crit("SMP: stopping secondary CPUs\n");
> smp_cross_call(&mask, IPI_CPU_STOP);
> }
>
> @@ -881,7 +874,8 @@ void smp_send_stop(void)
> udelay(1);
>
> if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
> - pr_warning("SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs\n");
> + pr_warning("SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs %*pbl\n",
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_online_mask));
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.9.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list