[RFC PATCH 09/11] drivers: acpi: implement acpi_dma_configure
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Fri Apr 15 09:31:58 PDT 2016
Hi Bjorn,
On 15/04/16 17:14, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:25:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On DT based systems, the of_dma_configure() API implements DMA configuration
>> for a given device. On ACPI systems an API equivalent to of_dma_configure()
>> is missing which implies that it is currently not possible to set-up DMA
>> operations for devices through the ACPI generic kernel layer.
>>
>> This patch fills the gap by introducing acpi_dma_configure/deconfigure()
>> calls, that carry out IOMMU configuration through IORT (on systems where
>> it is present) and call arch_setup_dma_ops(...) with the retrieved
>> parameters.
>>
>> The DMA range size passed to arch_setup_dma_ops() is sized according
>> to the device coherent_dma_mask (starting at address 0x0), mirroring the
>> DT probing path behaviour when a dma-ranges property is not provided
>> for the device being probed; this changes the current arch_setup_dma_ops()
>> call parameters in the ACPI probing case, but since arch_setup_dma_ops()
>> is a NOP on all architectures but ARM/ARM64 this patch does not change
>> the current kernel behaviour on them.
>>
>> This patch updates ACPI and PCI core code to use the newly introduced
>> acpi_dma_configure function, providing the same functionality
>> as of_dma_configure on ARM systems and leaving behaviour unchanged
>> for all other arches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
>> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn at semihalf.com>
>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro at 8bytes.org>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
>
> There's only a tiny PCI change in this series, so I assume somebody
> else will merge all this. Here's my ack for the PCI part:
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> # for drivers/pci/probe.c change
>
> One question on use of pci_for_each_dma_alias() below.
>
>> +static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
>> +{
>> + u32 *rid = data;
>> +
>> + *rid = alias;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_iommu_configure - Set-up IOMMU configuration for a device.
>> + *
>> + * @dev: device that requires IOMMU set-up
>> + *
>> + * Returns: iommu_ops pointer on configuration success
>> + * NULL on configuration failure
>> + */
>> +struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_iort_node *node, *parent;
>> + struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL;
>> + struct iommu_fwspec fwspec;
>> + struct iort_iommu_node *iommu_node;
>> + u32 rid = 0, devid = 0;
>> +
>> + if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
>> + struct pci_bus *bus = to_pci_dev(dev)->bus;
>> +
>> + pci_for_each_dma_alias(to_pci_dev(dev), __get_pci_rid,
>> + &rid);
>
> You end up with only the last DMA alias in "rid". Is it really true
> that you only need to call iort_dev_map_rid() for one of the aliases?
Indeed - all we care about is what things look like by the time they
come out of the root complex on their way to the the IOMMU, so whatever
intermediate aliasing _within_ the PCI bus might happen along the way
doesn't actually matter.
Robin.
>> + node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX,
>> + iort_find_dev_callback, &bus->dev);
>> + } else
>> + node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT,
>> + iort_find_dev_callback, dev);
>> +
>> + if (!node)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + iort_dev_map_rid(node, rid, &devid, ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU);
>> +
>> + parent = iort_find_parent_node(node, ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU);
>> +
>> + if (!parent)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + iommu_node = iort_iommu_get_node(parent);
>> + ops = iommu_node->ops;
>> +
>> + fwspec.fwnode = iommu_node->fwnode;
>> + fwspec.param_count = 1;
>> + fwspec.param[0] = devid;
>> +
>> + if (!ops || !ops->fw_xlate || ops->fw_xlate(dev, &fwspec))
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return ops;
>> +}
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list