[PATCH 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Differentiate specific implementations

[Chalamarla, Tirumalesh]

On 4/13/16, 10:12 AM, "Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote:

>As the inevitable reality of implementation-specific errata workarounds
>begin to accrue alongside our integration quirk handling, it's about
>time the driver had a decent way of keeping track. Extend the per-SMMU
>data so we can identify specific implementations in an efficient and
>firmware-agnostic manner.
>
>Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
>---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>index e933679..2d5f357 100644
>--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>@@ -278,6 +278,10 @@ enum arm_smmu_arch_version {
> 	ARM_SMMU_V2,
> };
> 
>+enum arm_smmu_implementation {
>+	GENERIC_SMMU,
>+};
>+
> struct arm_smmu_smr {
> 	u8				idx;
> 	u16				mask;
>@@ -315,6 +319,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
> #define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SECURE_CFG_ACCESS (1 << 0)
> 	u32				options;
> 	enum arm_smmu_arch_version	version;
>+	enum arm_smmu_implementation	model;
> 
> 	u32				num_context_banks;
> 	u32				num_s2_context_banks;
>@@ -1735,13 +1740,24 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
>+struct arm_smmu_match_data {
>+	enum arm_smmu_arch_version version;
>+	enum arm_smmu_implementation model;
>+};
>+
>+#define ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(name, ver, imp)	\
>+static struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = imp }
>+
>+ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v1, ARM_SMMU_V1, GENERIC_SMMU);
>+ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU);
>+
> static const struct of_device_id arm_smmu_of_match[] = {
>-	{ .compatible = "arm,smmu-v1", .data = (void *)ARM_SMMU_V1 },
>-	{ .compatible = "arm,smmu-v2", .data = (void *)ARM_SMMU_V2 },
>-	{ .compatible = "arm,mmu-400", .data = (void *)ARM_SMMU_V1 },
>-	{ .compatible = "arm,mmu-401", .data = (void *)ARM_SMMU_V1 },
>-	{ .compatible = "arm,mmu-500", .data = (void *)ARM_SMMU_V2 },
>-	{ .compatible = "cavium,smmu-v2", .data = (void *)ARM_SMMU_V2 },
>+	{ .compatible = "arm,smmu-v1", .data = &smmu_generic_v1 },
>+	{ .compatible = "arm,smmu-v2", .data = &smmu_generic_v2 },
>+	{ .compatible = "arm,mmu-400", .data = &smmu_generic_v1 },
>+	{ .compatible = "arm,mmu-401", .data = &smmu_generic_v1 },
>+	{ .compatible = "arm,mmu-500", .data = &smmu_generic_v2 },
>+	{ .compatible = "cavium,smmu-v2", .data = &smmu_generic_v2 },
> 	{ },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smmu_of_match);
>@@ -1749,6 +1765,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smmu_of_match);
> static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>+	const struct arm_smmu_match_data *data;
> 	struct resource *res;
> 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>@@ -1764,7 +1781,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 	smmu->dev = dev;
> 
> 	of_id = of_match_node(arm_smmu_of_match, dev->of_node);
>-	smmu->version = (enum arm_smmu_arch_version)of_id->data;
>+	data = of_id->data;
>+	smmu->version = data->version;
>+	smmu->model = data->model;
> 
> 	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> 	smmu->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>-- 
>2.7.3.dirty
Looks good to me. 

Acked-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla<tchalamarla at caviumnetworks.com>
>